digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Wikipedia says that it doesn't have anything that exactly matches "Category:Pseudoscience". Maybe try a search?


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/ — Please support Wikipedia.
A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
454807 videos foundNext > 

Science vs. Pseudoscience

http://facebook.com/ScienceReason ... World Skeptics Congress 2012: Science vs. Pseudoscience - Opening with Amardeo Sarma. More videos of the World Skeptics...

Richard Feynman and Pseudoscience

Richard Feynman (a Nobel Prize winner) speaking about pseudoscience. This is a segment from the BBC Horizon Interview (The Pleasure of Finding Things out), 1...

EF16: Uncle Kage's Science Pseudoscience & Crap p2/4

Anti-Science, Science Policy & Pseudoscience

Many politicians and viable candidates promote distinctly anti-science rhetoric; why are so many Americans ready to accept ignorant or hostile takes on topic...

The Eyes of Nye - Pseudoscience (Season 1, Episode 2)

Great program. Think of it as a somewhat more mature version of Bill Nye The Science Guy.

SSS (2of14) - Science vs. Pseudoscience

from Brian Brushwood's lecture, Scams, Sasquatch and the Supernatural. Sorry this clip has slightly lower quality audio than the others. You can find the who...

inFact: 5 Ways to Tell Science from Pseudoscience

Here are 5 quick ways for you to tell good science from bad science. http://infactvideo.com.

EF16: Uncle Kage's Science Pseudoscience & Crap p1/4

EF16: Uncle Kage's Science Pseudoscience & Crap p3/4

Popper : science et pseudo-science

Synthèse sur la distinction entre science et pseudo-science selon Karl Popper.

454807 videos foundNext > 

2 news items

Scientific American (blog)

Scientific American (blog)
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:17:43 -0700

But for this post, I'm dealing specifically with qualities of writers of popular science.) It is as important to write about good science as it is to write about bad “science.” Pseudoscience, wacky “scientific” claims and pure and utter bull can cause ...
 
New York Times
Mon, 27 May 2013 18:09:50 -0700

We're living in an empirical age. The most impressive intellectual feats have been achieved by physicists and biologists, and these fields have established a distinctive model of credibility. Enlarge This Image ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Science/Pseudoscience

You can talk about Science/Pseudoscience with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!