digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















Why–because analysis (WBA) is a method for accident analysis.[1] It is independent of application domain and has been used to analyse, among others, aviation-, railway-, marine-, and computer-related accidents and incidents. It is mainly used as an after the fact (or a posteriori) analysis method. WBA strives to ensure objectivity, falsifiability and reproducibility of results.

The result of a WBA is a why–because graph (WBG). The WBG depicts causal relations between factors of an accident. It is a directed acyclic graph where the nodes of the graph are factors. Directed edges denote cause–effect relations between the factors.

WBA in detail[edit]

WBA starts with the question "What is the accident or accidents in question?". In most cases this is easy to define. Next comes an iterative process to determine causes. When causes for the accident have been identified, formal tests are applied to all potential cause-effect relations. This process can be iterated for the newfound causes, and so on, until a satisfactory result has been achieved.

At each node (factor), each contributing cause (related factor) must have been necessary to cause the accident, and the totality of causes must have been sufficient to do so.

The formal tests[edit]

The counterfactual test (CT) – The CT leads back to David Lewis' formal notion of causality and counterfactuals. The CT asks the following question: "If the cause had not been, could the effect have happened?". The CT proves or disproves that a cause is a necessary causal factor for an effect. Only if it is necessary for the cause in question then it is clearly contributing to the effect.

The causal sufficiency test – The CST asks the question: "Will an effect always happen if all attributed causes happen?". The CST aims at deciding whether a set of causes are sufficient for an effect to happen. The missing of causes can thus be identified.

Only if for all causal relations the CT is positive and for all sets of causes to their effects the CST is positive the WBG is correct: each cause must be necessary (CT), and the totality of causes must be sufficient (CST): nothing is omitted (CST: the listed causes are sufficient), and nothing is superfluous (CT: each cause is necessary).


Partial Why–because graph of the capsizing of the Herald of Free Enterprise

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Ladkin, Peter; Loer, Karsten (April 1998). Analysing Aviation Accidents Using WB-Analysis - an Application of Multimodal Reasoning (PDF). Spring Symposion. AAAI. 

External links[edit]

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why–because_analysis — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

Retail Analysis: Why Big Data Doesn’t Always Help Northwest Arkansas 479 877 9052

Star Wars Trailer ALL EASTER EGGS (Force Awakens Trailer ANALYZED)

We've got ALL the Star Wars Trailer Easter Eggs! The Force Awakens Easter Eggs and References tease the Star Wars: The Force Awakens plot, but the FINAL ...

An Introduction to Georges Lefebvre’s The Coming of the French Revolution - A Macat History Analysis

It is vital to understand how and why the French Revolution of 1789 happened. Why? Because what happened at that time influenced so many of our modern ...

The Karate Kid: Daniel is the REAL Bully [J. Matthew Movies, Ep 3]

Daniel LaRusso is a violent sociopath who picks every fight in The Karate Kid. Check out my comment response video: https://youtu.be/cd82fxIbqUE , and ...

【Analysis】Sonic -ZeRo

Twitch: http://www.Twitch.tv/ZeRo ▻Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/TSMZeRo ▻Facebook: http://www.Facebook.com/chilezero ▻Instagram: ...

Why are So Many People Supporting Donald Trump? - Because they are Smart IMO - Analysis

Why are so many people supporting Donald Trump? - because they are smart IMO. People don't want politics as usual and know instinctively that the country ...

FULL ANALYSIS of leaked Kit Harington on set picture - Game of Thrones S06 News

Warning, this video contains spoilers for season 6 Are you good to stay? alright cool! Ok so, here's the deal, a new picture of Kit Harington on set has been ...

Why Are American Health Care Costs So High?

In which John discusses the complicated reasons why the United States spends so much more on health care than any other country in the world, and along the ...

Sequelitis - Mega Man Classic vs. Mega Man X

Mega Man was a game that was so simple and yet so ahead of its time. It defined an entire genre and continues to be considered one of the best titles in video ...

USD/CAD Forex Top Down Analysis

1000000 videos foundNext > 

3 news items


Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:37:30 -0700

Why? Because analysis of the model number suggests that it is not a new phone altogether but seems to be a derivative of the S6. Moreover, the model number reveals that it will probably be made available in South Korea, the US and certain markets in ...


Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:47:25 -0800

Why? Because "Analysis of Cork-Board Networking" was just randomness. It was also the weakest episode of Season 5 so far, and I don't think many viewers would debate that. That's due in part to the season being so strong up until this point, and in ...

The Conversation UK

The Conversation UK
Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:03:45 -0800

Peter is the originator of Why-Because Analysis (WBA) for the causal analysis of untoward incidents and accidents, as well as Ontological Hazard Analysis (OHA) for relatively complete hazard analysis and traceability of safety requirements through ...

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight