digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Why–because analysis (WBA) is a method for accident analysis.[1] It is independent of application domain and has been used to analyse, among others, aviation-, railway-, marine-, and computer-related accidents and incidents. It is mainly used as an after the fact (or a posteriori) analysis method. WBA strives to ensure objectivity, falsifiability and reproducibility of results.

The result of a WBA is a why–because graph (WBG). The WBG depicts causal relations between factors of an accident. It is a directed acyclic graph where the nodes of the graph are factors. Directed edges denote cause–effect relations between the factors.

WBA in detail[edit]

WBA starts with the question "What is the accident or accidents in question?". In most cases this is easy to define. Next comes an iterative process to determine causes. When causes for the accident have been identified, formal tests are applied to all potential cause-effect relations. This process can be iterated for the newfound causes, and so on, until a satisfactory result has been achieved.

At each node (factor), each contributing cause (related factor) must have been necessary to cause the accident, and the totality of causes must have been sufficient to do so.

The formal tests[edit]

The counterfactual test (CT) – The CT leads back to David Lewis' formal notion of causality and counterfactuals. The CT asks the following question: "If the cause had not been, could the effect have happened?". The CT proves or disproves that a cause is a necessary causal factor for an effect. Only if it is necessary for the cause in question then it is clearly contributing to the effect.

The causal sufficiency test – The CST asks the question: "Will an effect always happen if all attributed causes happen?". The CST aims at deciding whether a set of causes are sufficient for an effect to happen. The missing of causes can thus be identified.

Only if for all causal relations the CT is positive and for all sets of causes to their effects the CST is positive the WBG is correct: each cause must be necessary (CT), and the totality of causes must be sufficient (CST): nothing is omitted (CST: the listed causes are sufficient), and nothing is superfluous (CT: each cause is necessary).

Example[edit]

Partial Why–because graph of the capsizing of the Herald of Free Enterprise

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Ladkin, Peter; Loer, Karsten (April 1998). "Analysing Aviation Accidents Using WB-Analysis - an Application of Multimodal Reasoning". Spring Symposion. AAAI. 

External links[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why–because_analysis — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

Breaking Bad Analysis - Ozymandias & To'hajiilee vs. Pilot Episode

One way I was able to give myself the therapy I need after last night's episode-- ANALYSIS! Yay! Fun, right? RIGHT?! I decided to break down any comparisons ...

Emily Dickinson's 712. "Because I could not stop for Death--" (Analysis & Interpretation)

Nick Courtright, an English professor, is the author of Let There Be Light (2014) and Punchline (2012), both available on Amazon and by order through your lo...

Why technical analysis just does not work either in forex trading or any market

Technical analysis or canned indicators or statistical models or indeed any trading method that is well know do not work long term in the market because fund...

Why? Because - an intro to explanation for kids

Uses a series of examples to introduce (for young children) the concepts of scientific explanation and cause and effect. Examples include giraffes, illness, ...

Prometheus Commentary, Analysis, & Why We're Not Fans of the Film

If you love the film...you won't like what we say, because we're not fans of the flick...but we do respect your opinions. Just be respectful, that's all we a...

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review (Part 1 of 7)

http://www.redlettermedia.com - Finally it's here! The truly epic review/critique/analysis/film making educational video of the 1999 film "Star Wars: The Pha...

3rd Place YCS Austin Frog Monarch Analysis : Because Monarchs never die, they just take formats off.

Technical Analysis: Trend Lines within Stocks

Trend lines are a way for you to predict price because technical analysis is based on future predictions. Trend Lines - Trend lines have to hit the price poi...

Sequelitis - Mega Man Classic vs. Mega Man X

Mega Man was a game that was so simple and yet so ahead of its time. It defined an entire genre and continues to be considered one of the best titles in vide...

Because of Winn Dixie by Kate DiCamillo (Review) - Minute Book Report

This is a quick summary and analysis of Because of Winn Dixie by Kate DiCamillo. This channel discusses and reviews books, novels, and short stories through ...

1000000 videos foundNext > 

1 news items

 
TV.com
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:47:25 -0800

Why? Because "Analysis of Cork-Board Networking" was just randomness. It was also the weakest episode of Season 5 so far, and I don't think many viewers would debate that. That's due in part to the season being so strong up until this point, and in ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight