digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















Why–because analysis (WBA) is a method for accident analysis.[1] It is independent of application domain and has been used to analyse, among others, aviation-, railway-, marine-, and computer-related accidents and incidents. It is mainly used as an after the fact (or a posteriori) analysis method. WBA strives to ensure objectivity, falsifiability and reproducibility of results.

The result of a WBA is a why–because graph (WBG). The WBG depicts causal relations between factors of an accident. It is a directed acyclic graph where the nodes of the graph are factors. Directed edges denote cause–effect relations between the factors.

WBA in detail[edit]

WBA starts with the question "What is the accident or accidents in question?". In most cases this is easy to define. Next comes an iterative process to determine causes. When causes for the accident have been identified, formal tests are applied to all potential cause-effect relations. This process can be iterated for the newfound causes, and so on, until a satisfactory result has been achieved.

At each node (factor), each contributing cause (related factor) must have been necessary to cause the accident, and the totality of causes must have been sufficient to do so.

The formal tests[edit]

The counterfactual test (CT) – The CT leads back to David Lewis' formal notion of causality and counterfactuals. The CT asks the following question: "If the cause had not been, could the effect have happened?". The CT proves or disproves that a cause is a necessary causal factor for an effect. Only if it is necessary for the cause in question then it is clearly contributing to the effect.

The causal sufficiency test – The CST asks the question: "Will an effect always happen if all attributed causes happen?". The CST aims at deciding whether a set of causes are sufficient for an effect to happen. The missing of causes can thus be identified.

Only if for all causal relations the CT is positive and for all sets of causes to their effects the CST is positive the WBG is correct: each cause must be necessary (CT), and the totality of causes must be sufficient (CST): nothing is omitted (CST: the listed causes are sufficient), and nothing is superfluous (CT: each cause is necessary).


Partial Why–because graph of the capsizing of the Herald of Free Enterprise

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Ladkin, Peter; Loer, Karsten (April 1998). "Analysing Aviation Accidents Using WB-Analysis - an Application of Multimodal Reasoning". Spring Symposion. AAAI. 

External links[edit]

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why–because_analysis — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

Lit. Analysis of Poetry - Because I Could Not Stop For Death by Dickinson 3-12-2013 6-32-40 PM

UniversityNow: Investment Analysis Course Cover

Why invest money? The answer is simple. People invest money because they wish to have even more money at some point in the future and believe that investing ...

3rd Place YCS Austin Frog Monarch Analysis : Because Monarchs never die, they just take formats off.

Golf Mental Tips - Golf Over Analysis Leads To Golf Paralysis - Golf Psychology

https://golfmentaltips.co.uk Golf Mental Tips - Golf Over Analysis Leads To Golf Paralysis - Golf Psychology This week Linda Candy discusses why you should not over analyze your golf shots...

Star Wars: The Phantom Menace Review (Part 1 of 7)

http://www.redlettermedia.com - Finally it's here! The truly epic review/critique/analysis/film making educational video of the 1999 film "Star Wars: The Pha...

Invisible Man - Thug Notes Summary and Analysis

You are invisible, understand, because you have yet to SUBSCRIBE! Tap dat: http://goo.gl/N4Fse9 Don't forget to hit up my boys at http://thugnotes.ting.com t...

Qualitative analysis of interview data: A step-by-step guide

Most of the content in this tutorial applies to qualitative data analysis in general. Do not forget to share it with your friends. The steps are also describ...

Startup Lab workshop: Cohort analysis

Google Ventures Startup Lab | This workshop led by Google engineer Brett Slatkin digs in to cohort analysis. He'll walk you through how he does it, show you ...

Roddick 150 mph Serve Analysis

Andy Roddick has the most efficient serve on tour because of his Range, Sequence, Separation, and Hip Speed. Tomas Berdych, who towers over Roddick at 6'5", ...

The Last Of Us Analysis: The Prologue

CAUTION: THIS VIDEO CONTAINS SPOILERS! Analysis of the prologue of The Last Of Us. I wanted to focus on Sarah, simply because I don't think she gets enough c...

1000000 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Why–because analysis" right now.


Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Why–because analysis

You can talk about Why–because analysis with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!