digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Supreme Court of South Australia
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government).svg
Arms of the Supreme Court of South Australia
Established 2 January 1837
Country  South Australia,  Australia
Location Adelaide
Coordinates 34°55′49″S 138°35′58″E / 34.930405°S 138.599496°E / -34.930405; 138.599496Coordinates: 34°55′49″S 138°35′58″E / 34.930405°S 138.599496°E / -34.930405; 138.599496
Decisions are appealed to High Court of Australia
Judge term length mandatory retirement by age of 70
Number of positions 13
Website Supreme Court of South Australia
Chief Justice of South Australia
Currently Chris Kourakis
Since 25 June 2012
The Supreme Court of South Australia building from Victoria Square.

The Supreme Court of South Australia[1] is the superior court for the Australian State of South Australia. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters, and hears the most serious criminal matters. The Supreme Court is the highest South Australian court in the Australian court hierarchy. It is constituted of a Chief Justice and 12 other judges (justices).

Contents

History [edit]

The creation of a Supreme Court was unique in the case of South Australia.[2] In South Australia the notion of a Supreme Court formed part of Edward Wakefield's theory of colonization, in contrast to the other Australian colonies, which established their courts long after the settlement of the colony.

The court was established by Letters Patent on 2 January 1837, five days after the colony was founded. It was endowed with all the common law and probate jurisdiction of the courts of Westminster. The first sessions were not held until May of that year, presided over by Sir John Jeffcott, the first judge of the court. (The title of Chief Justice was not officially introduced until the coming into force of Act No 31 of 1855-1856.)

After Sir John Jeffcott's death in December 1837, Henry Jickling was appointed as an acting judge. Although appointed as a caretaker judge, Jickling was responsible for two important issues: he codifed the testamentary causes jurisdiction of the court and admitted the first practitioners of the Supreme Court in March 1838.

Justice Jeffcott's replacement on the Court was Sir Charles Cooper. Reports of ill health prompted Governor Young to ask for the appointment of a second judge, as a result Justice Crawford was appointed. Justice Crawford was the first justice to wear a wig in court. Crawford died after only two years on the bench.

Crawford was replaced by Justice Boothby. Boothby was a controversial judge who did not believe in the power of the colonial parliaments to enact laws. He arguably started the first constitutional crisis in Australian history when he ruled that the South Australian Constitution of 1856 was invalid, causing the Imperial Parliament to pass the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865. Boothby was removed as a justice of the Supreme Court in July 1867. He appealed to the Privy Council in England but he died before his appeal could be heard. Unfortunately, we will never know whether he was lawfully removed or not.

During Boothby's time on the Court, the first Queen's Counsels were appointed and the first circuit sittings of the Court took place in country South Australia. Also, during his time on the Court, the world's first ocean-going (all) iron-hulled and armoured battleship, the (British) HMS Warrior, was launched. It is not known for sure if it was launched in response to the constitutional crisis he arguably created, but pundits have suggested as much.

In 1935 the Supreme Court Act came into existence.[3]

Jurisdiction [edit]

The Supreme Court exercises both original and appellate jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters. The Supreme Court is a court of both law and equity. Although it has unlimited jurisdiction in civil matters, generally the civil trials heard in the Supreme Court are those involving complex legal or factual issues or large sums of money. The Supreme Court also has exclusive jurisdiction in probate (Wills & Estates), meaning that it is the only South Australian court which can hear such matters. In criminal matters, generally only the most serious crimes are tried in the Supreme Court (for example Murder, Treason, Attempted Murder and Manslaughter) although the Court occasionally hears trials for less serious offences. Trials for Murder and Treason may not be heard in any other court in South Australia. When exercising its original jurisdiction, the Court is usually constituted of a single judge.

The Supreme Court hears appeals from the Magistrates Court of South Australia in both civil and criminal matters, and also from decisions of Supreme Court Masters and various other tribunals. In such cases, the Court ordinarily is constituted of a single judge. The Court sits as a Full Court (usually constituted by a bench of three judges) when it hears appeals from the decisions of a single judge of the Supreme Court or District Court, or from certain other tribunals. Some of these appeals lie as of right, while others require leave (permission) from either the court appealed from or the Supreme Court. When the Supreme Court sits as a Full Court in criminal matters (other than those originating in the Magistrates Court and Youth Court), it is commonly referred to as the "Court of Criminal Appeal".

Unlike the Supreme Courts of some other States, the Supreme Court of South Australia is not divided into separate trial and appeal divisions. From time to time, all judges of the court sit in civil and criminal trials and as members of the Full Court and Court of Criminal Appeal. There is a division of the Court known as the Land and Valuation Court, which has jurisdiction over matters arising under particular State statutes dealing with planning and development law. Judges are assigned to this division by proclamation. In addition, particular judges may be designated to sit in the probate jurisdiction or assigned case management functions in respect of long and complex trials.

The proceedings of the Supreme Court of South Australia are normally heard in Adelaide. In civil cases the Court normally sits in the old Supreme Court building, while criminal matters are generally heard in the Sir Samuel Way Building. (The two buildings are located across the road from each other, on the corner of Gouger Street and Victoria Square.) The Court is empowered to sit in any place, including outside the State. The Court, constituted by a single judge, regularly travels on circuit to the rural centres of Mount Gambier and Port Augusta.

Subject to statutory exceptions, an appeal is available by special leave to the High Court of Australia from all decisions of the Supreme Court of South Australia by virtue of s 73 of the Australian Constitution. Ordinarily, appeals are taken to the High Court only from decisions of the Full Court or Court of Criminal Appeal.

See also [edit]

References [edit]

  1. ^ "The Supreme Court". Courts Administration Authority, South Australia. Retrieved 13 November 2012. 
  2. ^ "The History of the Supreme Court". Courts Administration Authority, South Australia. Retrieved 13 November 2012. 
  3. ^ Supreme Court Act 1935 (SA)

External links [edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_South_Australia — Please support Wikipedia.
A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
3890 videos foundNext > 

Flinders University / Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of South Australia sat at Flinders University recently to hear a challenge to mandatory voting in Australia. As part of Flinders inDaily, w...

Media & Culture - Open Day 2011 - University of South Australia

The Communication (Media & Culture) program provides students with a professional and vocational education in the dynamic and rapidly changing field of media, popular culture and communications....

ERD - How to Lodge an Appeal

Completing a Notice of appeal To lodge a planning appeal with the Environment, Resources and Development Court of South Australia you need to complete a Noti...

LEGAL FIRST - 2/4/2013

In a legal first for South Australia, Supreme Court Chief Justice Chris Kourakis has sat as a Magistrate for the day.

Castan Conference 2011 - Lyn McDade

'Military justice and human rights' Abstract: The presentation will briefly outline the history and statutory framework of Military Justice in Australia, and...

Law - Interview 1

A video about studying the Bachelor of Laws and Legal Practice at Flinders. Features an interview with Corrine Harrison, Chief Justice Associate, Supreme Cou...

ERD - How to apply for, and what to expect in, an Out of Time Hearing

An out-of-time hearing To appeal a planning decision made by a local council in South Australia you need to lodge your appeal with the Environment, Resources...

22 Million Dollar Woman seeks Pro-Bono Lawyer - Part 01

Let me make one thing perfectly clear, I don't know anyone in the Mafia and I don't agree with the way Mafia members live their life, but as far as I'm conce...

Legal Cruelty (Part 3)

Authorised, T. van Lieshout, State Director, WestAusParty, Hilton, WA, 6163. In light of recent developments in the Supreme Court WA, I'm publishing this for...

Andrew Laming MP speaks on social security legislation in Parliament

Andrew supports legislation to prevent people previously convicted of welfare fraud from appealing their convictions as a result of recent decisions by the S...

3890 videos foundNext > 

3 news items

 
Lexology (registration)
Thu, 16 May 2013 09:38:47 -0700

His Honour followed a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia in Trevorrow v State of South Australia in which the State had given discovery and claimed privilege over 10 documents. Trevorrow had previously obtained these ...
 
Mondaq News Alerts (registration)
Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:09:32 -0700

From the 2008 decision of Environmental Systems v Peerless, Australia has progressively moved further away from the English approach to consequential loss. The recent Supreme Court of South Australia case, Alstom Ltd v Yokogawa Australia Pty Ltd ...

Asia Property Report

Asia Property Report
Mon, 13 May 2013 02:34:14 -0700

Julian Male of Synercorp International is a Solicitor Barrister of the Supreme Court of South Australia graduate with 10 years of experience advising expatriates & international investors both onshore Australia and in the Asia Pacific region ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Supreme Court of South Australia

You can talk about Supreme Court of South Australia with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!