digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

For the Vaeda album, see State of Nature (album). For the United Kingdom 2013 State of Nature Report, see Royal Society for the Protection of Birds#State of Nature Report.

The state of nature is a concept in moral and political philosophy used in religion, social contract theories and international law[1] to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people might have been like before societies came into existence. There must have been a time before organized societies existed, and this presumption raises questions such as: "What was life like before civil society?"; "How did government first emerge from such a starting position?," and; "What are the hypothetical reasons for entering a state of society by establishing a Nation-state?".

In some versions of social contract theory, there are no rights in the state of nature, only freedoms, and it is the contract that creates rights and obligations. In other versions the opposite occurs: the contract imposes restrictions upon individuals that curtail their natural rights.

Societies existing before or without a political state are currently studied in such fields paleolithic history, and the anthropological subfields of archaeology, cultural anthropology, social anthropology, and ethnology, which investigate the social and power-related structures of indigenous and uncontacted peoples living in tribal communities.

Noted philosophers[edit]

Thomas Aquinas[edit]

The term "state of nature" appears in the writings of Thomas Aquinas (born c. 1225) (see De Veritate, Question 19, Article 1, Answer 13). Aside from its influence upon later Political Philosophy, the use of the term in Aquinas is also of key importance for the development of the Catholic "Natural Law" Theological Tradition; its biblical theological provenance goes back to a pregnant statement of the Apostle Paul in his Letter to the Romans (Romans 2:12–16).

For Paul, in Romans chapter 2, the "natural law" is contrasted with the Mosaic Law posited on Mount Sinai in that the Jewish Nation possessed the latter while the Gentile Nations lacked the Law of Moses but possessed the former in virtue of knowing (some of its central commandments) and obeying it (partially) "by nature." From this theological interpretation (one now controversial among leading Paulinists[who?], i.e., it is disputed that Paul actually intended all of the later machinery of the "Natural Law" tradition) it was but a small step to speak of this perceived natural condition of the Gentile Nations (i.e., their "natural" nomological condition) as a "state of nature."

However, for Aquinas, following Aristotle, the State of Nature is not logically (or temporally) prior to the politically constituted community but is that community, i.e., for both Aristotle and Aquinas the political state is natural for human beings (see Encyclopedia of Political Theory, by Mark Bevin, s.v., "Thomism, "Natural Law"). In later Political Philosophy (e.g., Hobbes and Locke) the (hypothetical if not temporal) positing of the priority of the State of Nature will become a standard move.

Aquinas also employed the terms "primitive state" (statum primi) and "state of innocence" (statu innocentiae) (see Summa Theologica, Part I, Question 97, "Of the Preservation of the Individual in the Primitive State").

Thomas Hobbes[edit]

The pure state of nature or "the natural condition of mankind" was deduced by the 17th century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, in Leviathan and in his earlier work On the Citizen.[2] Hobbes argued that all humans are by nature equal in faculties of body and mind (i.e., no natural inequalities are so great as to give anyone a "claim" to an exclusive "benefit"). From this equality and other causes in human nature, everyone is naturally willing to fight one another: so that "during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called warre; and such a warre as is of every man against every man". In this state every person has a natural right or liberty to do anything one thinks necessary for preserving one's own life; and life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short" (Leviathan, Chapters XIII–XIV). Hobbes described this natural condition with the Latin phrase bellum omnium contra omnes (meaning war of all against all), in his work De Cive.

Within the state of nature there is neither personal property nor injustice since there is no law, except for certain natural precepts discovered by reason ("laws of nature"): the first of which is "that every man ought to endeavour peace, as far as he has hope of obtaining it" (Leviathan, Ch. XIV); and the second is "that a man be willing, when others are so too, as far forth as for peace and defence of himself he shall think it necessary, to lay down this right to all things; and be contented with so much liberty against other men as he would allow other men against himself" (loc. cit.). From here Hobbes develops the way out of the state of nature into political society and government, by mutual contracts.

According to Hobbes the state of nature exists at all times among independent countries, over whom there is no law except for those same precepts or laws of nature (Leviathan, Chapters XIII, XXX end). His view of the state of nature helped to serve as a basis for theories of international law and realism.[citation needed]

John Locke[edit]

John Locke considers the state of nature in his Second Treatise on Civil Government written around the time of the Exclusion Crisis in England during the 1680s. For Locke, in the state of nature all men are free "to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature." (2nd Tr., §4). "The state of Nature has a law of Nature to govern it", and that law is Reason. Locke believes that reason teaches that "no one ought to harm another in his life, liberty, and or property"; and that transgressions of this may be punished. This view of the state of nature is partly deduced from Christian belief (unlike Hobbes, whose philosophy is not dependent upon any prior theology).

Although it may be natural to assume that Locke was responding to Hobbes, Locke never refers to Hobbes by name, and may instead have been responding to other writers of the day, like Robert Filmer.[3] In fact, Locke's First Treatise is entirely a response to Filmer's Patriarcha, and takes a step by step method to refuting Filmer's theory set out in Patriarcha. The conservative party at the time had rallied behind Filmer's Patriarcha, whereas the Whigs, scared of another prosecution of Anglicans and Protestants, rallied behind the theory set out by Locke in his Two Treatises of Government; as it gives a clear theory as to why you should be allowed to overthrow a monarchy who abuses the trust set in it by the people.

Montesquieu[edit]

Montesquieu makes use of the concept of the State of Nature in his The Spirit of the Laws, first printed in 1748.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau[edit]

Hobbes' view was challenged in the eighteenth century by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who claimed that Hobbes was taking socialized people and simply imagining them living outside of the society in which they were raised. He affirmed instead that people were neither good nor bad. In Rousseau's state of nature, people did not know each other enough to come into serious conflict, and they did have normal values. The modern society, and the ownership it entails, is blamed for the disruption of the state of nature which Rousseau sees as true freedom.[4]

David Hume[edit]

David Hume offers in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739) that human beings are naturally social: "'Tis utterly impossible for men to remain any considerable time in that savage condition, which precedes society; but that his very first state and situation may justly be esteem'd social. This, however, hinders not, but that philosophers may, if they please, extend their reasoning to the suppos'd state of nature; provided they allow it to be a mere philosophical fiction, which never had, and never cou'd have any reality." (Book III, Part II, Section II: "Of the Origin of Justice and Property."

Hume's ideas about human nature expressed in the Treatise suggest that he would be happy with neither Hobbes' nor his contemporary Rousseau's thought-experiments. He explicitly derides as incredible the hypothetical humanity described in Hobbes' Leviathan (Book II, Part III, Section I: "Of Liberty and Necessity"). Additionally, he argues in "Of the Origin of Justice and Property" that if mankind were universally benevolent, we would not hold Justice to be a virtue: "’tis only from the selfishness and confin’d generosity of men, along with the scanty provision nature has made for his wants, that justice derives its origin."

20th century[edit]

John Rawls used what amounted to an artificial state of nature. To develop his theory of justice, Rawls places everyone in the original position. The original position is a hypothetical state of nature used as a thought experiment development to Rawls' theory of justice. People in the original position have no society and are under a veil of ignorance that prevents them from knowing how they may benefit from society. They lack foreknowledge of their intelligence, wealth, or abilities. Rawls reasons that people in the original position would want a society where they had their basic liberties protected and where they had some economic guarantees as well. If society were to be constructed from scratch through a social agreement between individuals, these principles would be the expected basis of such an agreement. Thus, these principles should form the basis of real, modern societies since everyone should consent to them if society were organized from scratch in fair agreements.

Rawls' Harvard colleague Robert Nozick countered the liberal A Theory of Justice with the libertarian Anarchy, State, and Utopia, also grounded in the state of nature tradition.[5] Nozick argued that a minimalist state of property rights and basic law enforcement would develop out of a state of nature without violating anyone's rights or using force. Mutual agreements among individuals rather than social contract would lead to this minimal state.

Between nations[edit]

In Hobbes' view, once a civil government is instituted, the state of nature has disappeared between individuals because of the civil power which exists to enforce contracts and the laws of nature generally. Between nations, however, no such power exists and therefore nations have the same rights to preserve themselves—including making war—as individuals possessed. Such a conclusion led some writers to the idea of an association of nations or worldwide civil society. Among them there were Immanuel Kant with his work on perpetual peace.

Rawls also examines the state of nature between nations. In his work the Law of Peoples, Rawls applies a modified version of his original position thought experiment to international relationships. Rawls says that peoples, not states, form the basic unit that should be examined. States should be encouraged to follow the principles from Rawls' earlier A Theory of Justice. Democracy seems like it would be the most logical means of accomplishing these goals, but benign non-democracies should be seen as acceptable at the international stage. Rawls develops eight principles for how a people should act on an international stage.

References[edit]

  1. ^ Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Preliminaries. Idea and General Principles. §4.
  2. ^ Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan. 1651. Edwin Curley (Ed.) 1994. Hackett Publishing.
  3. ^ Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics. Cambridge.
  4. ^ Jean-Jacques Rousseau, A Discourse on Inequality
  5. ^ Rothbard, Murray N. (1977). "Robert Nozick and the Immaculate Conception of the State" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 1, Num 1.: 45–47. 

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_nature — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

KING 810 - State of Nature [OFFICIAL VIDEO]

KING 810's music video for 'State of Nature' from the album, Memoirs of a Murderer - available now on Roadrunner Records. Get it on iTunes at http://smarturl...

Hobbes vs. Locke - State of Nature

Philosophy 1301 Project: Thomas Hobbes State of Nature vs. John Locke State of Nature Thomas Hobbes Civil Society vs. John Locke Civil Society, Song: Chromat...

Introduction to the State of Nature - Political Philosophy [1] [EN]

First video dedicated to political philosophy on the State of Nature, important concept to understand social contract theories. Plan: 1) Definition of the St...

State of Nature Iolo Williams 22:05:13

The State of Nature and Social Contract Theory

Jason Jackson of www.jeffersonjackson.com explains the basics of the state of nature and social contract theory in his effort to make politics simple.

The State of Nature according to Locke - Political Philosophy [3] [EN]

Third video on political philosophy dedicated to Locke's conception of the State of Nature. Plan: 1) A quick glance at Hobbe's philosophy 2) Locke's concepti...

Thomas Hobbes: The State of Nature

Our presentation on Thomas Hobbes using Black Ops characters to act out the scenario of man's natural state as believed by Thomas Hobbes.

State of Nature Trevor Dines 22:05:13

6. Rousseau on State of Nature and Education

Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) The general will—dangerous if taken too far—operates in many elements of our social and civic life. Immunizat...

Sir David Attenborough - State of Nature

Sir David Attenborough's inspiring address to the RSPB Conference for Nature.on 3 September 2014 at Church House, Westminster.

1000000 videos foundNext > 

130 news items

 
DhakaTribune
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:42:05 -0700

I woke up in a sweat this morning, remembering suddenly that I must complete and submit my article by tonight. I had not given the piece a minute of thought, and had neither an idea nor a clue as to what to write about. Finally, after a busy day, it ...
 
Indiana Daily Student
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:03:45 -0700

But we're not in a state of nature. We live in a prosperous society with order and rules and lots of good people. When fear starts to permeate our reality and not our movies and books this Halloween season, we can start to lose hope. Despite our fears ...

Nigeria Master Web

Nigeria Master Web
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 05:22:30 -0700

It was also social contradictions inherent in human society and its social environment that brought about the Hobbessian state of nature where life was said to be short, nasty and brutish. This nasty state of nature later gave birth to government ...
 
The Guardian
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:22:26 -0700

“Helping people across the country to reconnect with nature - through recording the wildlife associated with our coasts and ponds - will make a really positive long-term difference both to people's enjoyment of the countryside and to the state of ...

Tech Cocktail

Tech Cocktail
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 05:56:15 -0700

We're slowly devolving into the state of nature, and in such a universe where modern laws no longer apply, the tools that once brought us functional value no longer provide any worth. Accordingly, we must develop a new set of technologies that conform ...

Smallholder

Smallholder
Thu, 30 Oct 2014 07:07:06 -0700

The RSPB has called on Defra to make “every pound count” in a new wildlife-friendly farm scheme as official figures reveal another huge drop in the number of bird species, such as turtle dove, skylark and yellowhammer, reliant on farmed landscapes.

Wall Street Journal

Wall Street Journal
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:47:15 -0700

About 90% of chimp males participated in a killing at some point in their lives. Getty Images. By. Robert M. Sapolsky. Oct. 29, 2014 10:46 a.m. ET. 42 COMMENTS. Rousseau versus Hobbes: one of the most famous philosophical smackdowns ever.
 
Torrington Register Citizen
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:24:33 -0700

Despite the overheated rhetoric of individualism, natural rights and the state of nature — the hoary abstractions of a political philosophy that glories in small parts at the expense of the whole — no one really believes that it takes anything other ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight