digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Roman SPQR banner.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
Ancient Rome
Periods
Roman Constitution
Ordinary magistrates
Extraordinary magistrates
Titles and honours
Precedent and law

The Senate of the Roman Kingdom was a political institution in the ancient Roman Kingdom. The word senate derives from the Latin word senex, which means "old man". Therefore, senate literally means "board of old men" and translates as "Council of Elders". The prehistoric Indo-Europeans who settled Rome in the centuries before the legendary founding of Rome in 753 BC[1] were structured into tribal communities.[2] These tribal communities often included an aristocratic board of tribal elders, who were vested with supreme authority over their tribe.[3] The early tribes that had settled along the banks of the Tiber eventually aggregated into a loose confederation, and eventually formed an alliance for protection against invaders.

The early Romans were deeply patriarchal. The early Roman family was called a gens or "clan".[2] Each clan was an aggregation of families under a common living male patriarch, called a pater (the Latin word for "father"). The pater was the undisputed master of his clan.[4] He had the absolute power to resolve any disputes, and to make any decisions for the collective gens. When the early Roman gens were aggregating to form a common community, the patres from the leading clans were selected[5] for the confederated board of elders (what would become the Roman Senate).[4] Legend states that the senate grew to a membership of 300 after three blocks of 100 senators were added at fixed points in time. What likely happened, however, was a gradual aggregation of patres over time, as more clans achieved high status.[5] The early senate derived its ultimate sovereignty from the fact that it was composed of the patriarchal heads of the leading families. As the individual patres led their families, the board of patres led the confederation of those families. In time, the patres came to recognize the need for a single leader. Therefore, they elected a king (rex),[4] and vested in him their sovereign power.[6] The king presided over the senate, appointed individuals to the senate (for life), and expelled individuals from the senate. When the king died, his sovereign power naturally reverted to the patres.[4]

Origin and Development[edit]

According to Livy the Senate, initially consisting of 100 men, was created by Rome's first king, Romulus. The descendants of those 100 men subsequently became the patrician class.[7]

100 more were added to the Senate by Rome's fifth king, Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, from amongst the minor leading families.[8]

Powers of the senate[edit]

The senate of the Roman Kingdom could only be convened by the king, and usually met in either a templum, or in some other location that had been consecrated by a religious official (an augur).[9] While the senate could pass "laws", it would be incorrect to view the "laws" passed during the time of the kingdom as legislation. In effect, these "laws" were actually the decrees of the king. The king had the absolute power to make any law. However, he often involved both the senate and the popular assembly (the "Curiate Assembly") in the process. The primary role of the senate in this process was to either assist the king, or to provide additional legitimacy to a decree of the king by declaring its support. Sometimes this involved debate in the senate over the proposed law or an actual vote on the law. However, the king was free to ignore any ruling that the senate ultimately passed.[9] In addition, during the days of the kingdom, the senate's limited prestige made it an accepted practice for the king to ignore advice handed down by the senate. The senate did, however, become an influential advisory council to the king. This tradition was maintained throughout the life of the Roman Republic, although in practice, the republican magistrates rarely acted against the wishes of the senate.[9]

Romulus, Victor over Acron, hauls the rich booty to the temple of Jupiter, by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres

The patres that filled the ranks of the early senate held a position of absolute dominance over their respective families.[4] Since the senate was filled with the patres of the leading families, their individual dominance over their individual families was consolidated into collective dominance over the collective families of the early Roman community. These were the original patrician families.

While the king was technically elected by the people, it was actually the senate who chose each new king. Since the consolidated authority of the patres of the senate chose the king, the king became the embodiment of that authority. Since the authority of each patre over his family was absolute,[4] the king was vested with the absolute authority over those families (and thus over the entire state). Since the king derived his authority from the patres, he (theoretically) could not pass that power on to an heir upon his death. Thus, the authority reverted to the senate when the king died.

The period between the death of one king, and the election of a new king, was called the interregnum.[10] The interregnum was the only period during which the senate exercised its sovereign power. During the first interregnum after the death of Romulus, the senate, comprised at that time of 100 men, arranged itself into ten decuries, and each decurio governed Rome for five days as interrex. The decurios continued to rotate the government amongst themselves for a year until the senate elected Numa Pompilius as king.[10]

The practice eventually evolved that, when a king died, it was a member of the senate (the Interrex) who nominated a candidate to replace the king.[11] If the senate gave its approval, then in practice, the people were unlikely to reject the nominee.[12] The formal election of the king by the people, however, did serve to confirm to the senate that the people (many of whom fought in the armies that were commanded by the king) found their new potential commander-in-chief to be acceptable.[11] After the senate gave its final approval, the Interrex declared the individual king, and then returned to the ranks of the senate.[11] In effect, the senate chose the king, the people ratified that choice, and the senate finalized the decision.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  • Abbott, Frank Frost (1901). A History and Description of Roman Political Institutions. Elibron Classics (ISBN 0-543-92749-0).
  • Byrd, Robert (1995). The Senate of the Roman Republic. U.S. Government Printing Office, Senate Document 103-23.
  • Cicero, Marcus Tullius (1841). The Political Works of Marcus Tullius Cicero: Comprising his Treatise on the Commonwealth; and his Treatise on the Laws. Translated from the original, with Dissertations and Notes in Two Volumes. By Francis Barham, Esq. London: Edmund Spettigue. Vol. 1.
  • Lintott, Andrew (1999). The Constitution of the Roman Republic. Oxford University Press (ISBN 0-19-926108-3).
  • Polybius (1823). The General History of Polybius: Translated from the Greek. By James Hampton. Oxford: Printed by W. Baxter. Fifth Edition, Vol 2.
  • Taylor, Lily Ross (1966). Roman Voting Assemblies: From the Hannibalic War to the Dictatorship of Caesar. The University of Michigan Press (ISBN 0-472-08125-X).

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Abbott, 3
  2. ^ a b Abbott, 1
  3. ^ Abbott, 12
  4. ^ a b c d e f Abbott, 6
  5. ^ a b Abbott, 16
  6. ^ Byrd, 42
  7. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:8
  8. ^ Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:35
  9. ^ a b c Abbott, 17
  10. ^ a b Livy, Ab urbe condita, 1:17
  11. ^ a b c Abbott, 14
  12. ^ Byrd, 20

Further reading[edit]

  • Ihne, Wilhelm. Researches Into the History of the Roman Constitution. William Pickering. 1853.
  • Johnston, Harold Whetstone. Orations and Letters of Cicero: With Historical Introduction, An Outline of the Roman Constitution, Notes, Vocabulary and Index. Scott, Foresman and Company. 1891.
  • Mommsen, Theodor. Roman Constitutional Law. 1871-1888
  • Tighe, Ambrose. The Development of the Roman Constitution. D. Apple & Co. 1886.
  • Von Fritz, Kurt. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity. Columbia University Press, New York. 1975.
  • The Histories by Polybius
  • Cambridge Ancient History, Volumes 9–13.
  • A. Cameron, The Later Roman Empire, (Fontana Press, 1993).
  • M. Crawford, The Roman Republic, (Fontana Press, 1978).
  • E. S. Gruen, "The Last Generation of the Roman Republic" (U California Press, 1974)
  • F. Millar, The Emperor in the Roman World, (Duckworth, 1977, 1992).
  • A. Lintott, "The Constitution of the Roman Republic" (Oxford University Press, 1999)

Primary sources[edit]

Secondary source material[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senate_of_the_Roman_Kingdom — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1145 videos foundNext > 

NEW WORLD ORDER UNITED NATIONS REVIVED ROMAN EMPIRE

Rise of Islam and Vilification of Christianity, Blasphemy Laws, Two State Solution/Antichrist treaty, Ancient Roman Empire, the Roman Senate and the Revived Roman Empire through the United...

The Roman Empire. Or Republic. Or...Which Was It?: Crash Course World History #10

In which John Green explores exactly when Rome went from being the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. Here's a hint: it had something to do with Julius Caes...

The Roman Empire - Tribute to Rome

This is a video tribute to Rome and the Roman Empire, it serves no political or ideological purpose. Music Composed By Hans Zimmer & Lisa Gerrard Copyright ©...

Roman Emperor Caligula and 1400 Days of Terror

Caligula (Latin: Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus;[1] 31 August 12 AD -- 22 January 41 AD), also known as Gaius, was Roman Emperor from 37 AD to 41 AD...

Full History Of The Roman Empire

The Roman Empire (Latin: Imperium Romanum) was the post-Republican period of the ancient Roman civilization, characterised by an autocratic form of governmen...

The Roman empire (From 300 B.C. - 640 A.D.)

The Roman Empire was the post-Republican period of the ancient Roman civilization, characterized by an autocratic form of government and large territorial ho...

The Jews and their fights against the Romans [FULL DOCUMENTARY]

Story of the Jews and their fights against the Romans and their land. (Biblical Mysteries EP21) The history of the Jews in the Roman Empire traces the intera...

The awesome video

this is one the beauties video. Various republics govern, or claim to govern, in the name of the people. Both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire used th...

The History of Rome Part I-The Roman Kingdom and Republic

Wait for it...THE ROMANS! Need I say more? Follow us on Twitter!: @KhAnubis Visit our website!: http://khanubisproductions.weebly.com.

THE ROMAN EMPIRE - RISE OF THE REPUBLIC

For more Military Campains of the Roman Empire visit: http://www.greatmilitarybattles.com/html/the_roman_empire.html.

1145 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Senate of the Roman Kingdom" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Senate of the Roman Kingdom

You can talk about Senate of the Roman Kingdom with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!