digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Rational-legal authority (also known as rational authority, legal authority, rational domination, legal domination, or bureaucratic authority) is a form of leadership in which the authority of an organization or a ruling regime is largely tied to legal rationality, legal legitimacy and bureaucracy. The majority of the modern states of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are rational-legal authorities, according to those who use this form of classification.

Rational-legal authority[edit]

In sociology, the concept of rational-legal domination comes from Max Weber's tripartite classification of authority (one of several classifications of government used by sociologists); the other two forms being traditional authority and charismatic authority. All of those three domination types represent an example of his ideal type concept. Weber noted that in history those ideal types of domination are always found in combinations.

In traditional authority, the legitimacy of the authority comes from tradition. Charismatic authority is legitimized by the personality and leadership qualities of the ruling individual. Finally, rational-legal authority derives its powers from the system of bureaucracy and legality.

Legal rationality and legitimacy[edit]

Under rational-legal authority, legitimacy is seen as coming from a legal order and the laws that have been enacted in it (see also natural law and legal positivism).

Weber defined legal order as a system where the rules are enacted and obeyed as legitimate because they are in line with other laws on how they can be enacted and how they should be obeyed. Further, they are enforced by a government that monopolizes their enactment and the legitimate use of physical force.

Emergence of the modern state[edit]

Weber wrote that the modern state based on rational-legal authority emerged from the patrimonial and feudal struggle for power (see traditional authority) uniquely in the Occidental civilization. The prerequisites for the modern Western state are:

  • monopolization by central authority of the means of administration and control based on a centralized and stable system of taxation and use of physical force
  • monopolization of legislative
  • organisation of an officialdom, dependent upon the central authority

Weber argued that some of those attributes have existed in various time or places, but together they existed only in Occidental civilization. The conditions that favoured this were

  • emergence of rational-legal rationality (various status groups in the Occident promoted that emergence)
  • emergence of modern officialdom (bureaucracy), which required
    • development of the money economy, where officials are compensated in money instead of kind (usually land grants)
    • quantitative and qualitative expansion of administrative tasks
    • centralisation and increased efficiency of administration.

Weber's belief that rational-legal authority did not exist in Imperial China has been heavily criticized, and does not have many supporters in the early 21st century.

Modern state[edit]

According to Max Weber, a modern state exists where a political community has:

  • an administrative and legal order that has been created and can be changed by legislation that also determines its role
  • binding authority over citizens and actions in its jurisdiction
  • the right to legitimately use the physical force in its jurisdiction

An important attribute of Weber's definition of a modern state was that it is a bureaucracy.

The vast majority of the modern states from the 20th century onward fall under the rational-legal authority category.

Rational-legal leaders[edit]

The majority of modern bureaucratic officials and political leaders represent this type of authority.

Officials:

  • are personally free.
  • serve a higher authority.
  • are appointed on the basis of conduct and their technical qualifications.
  • are responsible for the impartial execution of assigned tasks.
  • Their work is a full-time occupation.
  • Their work is rewarded by a salary and prospects of career advancement.

Politicians:

  • are solely responsible for independent action.
  • must recognize that public actions that conflict with their basic policy must be rejected.
  • should have charismatic appeal to win elections under conditions of universal suffrage.

See also[edit]

External links[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational-legal_authority — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
3481 videos foundNext > 

20. Weber on Legal-Rational Authority

Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) The purest form—the ideal type—of Weber's legal-rational type of authority is bureaucracy. Legal-rational aut...

Max Weber - Types of Authority

Max Weber's contribution of "Types of Authority" is a typology about how authority presents itself in different types of societies. Tradtional Authority, Cha...

Rational legal authority

19. Weber on Charismatic Authority

Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) Charismatic authority, unlike traditional authority, is a revolutionary and unstable form of authority. Weber...

21. Weber's Theory of Class

Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) Along with the macro-level shift from traditional forms of authority to legal-rational authority, Weber's the...

I just contacted legal authorities

17. Conceptual Foundations of Weber's Theory of Domination

Foundations of Modern Social Thought (SOCY 151) Diverging significantly from Marx's idea that history can be traced by the modes of production and the econom...

Legal authority

DuPont Neighborhood Meeting 10082012 Legal Authority 0001

Mayor Michael Grayum agrees that he has no authority to spend tax money collected. The decisions to pass a budget in DuPont Washington resides with the city ...

GOD 3.0: BIBLE READING IS RATIONAL AND FUN

Presenting indisputable evidence showing within appropriate historical and rational context that JESUS OF NAZARETH, GOD 2.0, BIO SON OF GOD 1.0 JEHOVAH, HAS ...

3481 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Rational-legal authority" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Rational-legal authority

You can talk about Rational-legal authority with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!