digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Ratification is a principal's approval of an act of its agent where the agent lacked authority to legally bind the principal.[clarification needed] The term applies to private contract law, international treaties, and constitutions in federations such as the United States and Canada.

Private law[edit]

In contract law, the need for ratification can arise in two ways: where the agent attempts to bind the principal despite lacking the authority to do so, and where the principal authorizes the agent to make an agreement, but reserves the right to approve it. An example of the first situation is where an employee not normally responsible for procuring supplies contracts to do so on the employer's behalf. The employer's choice on discovering the contract is to ratify it or to repudiate it.

The other situation is common in trade union collective bargaining agreements. The Union authorizes one or more people to negotiate and sign an agreement with management. A collective bargaining agreement can not become legally binding until the union members ratify the agreement. If they do not approve it, the agreement is of no effect, and negotiations resume.

Ratification of an international treaty[edit]

Main article: Treaty

The ratification of international treaties is usually accomplished by filing instruments of ratification as provided for in the treaty.[1] In most democracies, the legislature authorizes the government to ratify treaties through standard legislative procedures (i.e., passing a bill).

United Kingdom[edit]

In the UK, treaty ratification was a Royal Prerogative, exercised by Her Majesty on the advice of her Government. But, by a convention called the Ponsonby Rule, treaties were usually placed before parliament for 21 days before ratification. This was put onto a statutory footing by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.

United States[edit]

In the US, the treaty power is a coordinated effort between the Executive branch and the Senate. The President may form and negotiate, but the treaty must be advised and consented to by a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Only after the Senate approves the treaty can the President ratify it. Once a treaty is ratified, it becomes binding on all the states under the Supremacy Clause. While the United States House of Representatives does not vote on it at all, the requirement for Senate advice and consent to ratification makes it considerably more difficult in the US than in other democratic republics to rally enough political support for international treaties. Also, if implementation of the treaty requires the expenditure of funds, the House of Representatives may be able to block, or at least impede, such implementation by refusing to vote for the appropriation of the necessary funds.

In the US, the President usually submits a treaty to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) along with an accompanying resolution of ratification or accession. If the treaty and resolution receive favorable committee consideration (a committee vote in favor of ratification or accession) the treaty is then forwarded to the floor of the full U.S. Senate for such a vote. The treaty or legislation does not apply until it has been ratified. A multilateral agreement may provide that it will take effect upon its ratification by less than all of the signatories.[2] Even though such a treaty takes effect, it does not apply to signatories that have not ratified it. Accession has the same legal effect as ratification. Accession is a synonym for ratification for treaties already negotiated and signed by other states.[3] An example of a treaty to which the U.S. Senate did not advise and consent to ratification is the Treaty of Versailles, which was part of the resolution of the First World War.

Australia[edit]

In Australia, power to enter into treaties is an executive power within Section 61 of the Australian Constitution. Thus the Australian Federal Government may enter into a binding treaty without seeking parliamentary approval. However, implementation of treaties does require legislation by Federal parliament, following Section 51(xxix) of the Australian Constitution and signed by the Governor-General of Australia.

Japan[edit]

In Japan, in principle both houses of the parliament (the National Diet) must approve the treaty for ratification. In the event the Upper House (House of Councilors) rejects a treaty approved by the Lower House (House of Representatives) and a joint committee of both houses cannot come to agreement on amendments to the original text of the treaty, or the Upper House fails to decide on a treaty for more than thirty (30) days, by the Constitutional supremacy of the House of Representatives the decision by the Lower House will be regarded as the vote of the National Diet approving the ratification. The approved treaty will then be promulgated into law by the Constitutional act of the Emperor.

Ratification of a constitution[edit]

Federations usually require the support of both the federal government and some given percentage of the constituent governments for amendments to the federal constitution to take effect.

Ratification in the United States Constitution[edit]

Article Seven of the constitution of the United States describes the process by which the entire document was to become effective. It required that conventions of nine of the thirteen original States ratify the constitution. If fewer than thirteen states ratified document, it would become effective only among the states ratifying it.[4] New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify, doing so on June 21, 1788, but, as a practical matter, it was decided to delay implementation of the new government until New York and Virginia could be persuaded to ratify. Congress intended that New York City should be the first capital, and that George Washington, of Mount Vernon, Virginia, should be the first President, and both of those things would have been somewhat awkward if either New York or Virginia were not part of the new government. Ratification by those states was secured, and the government under the Constitution began on March 4, 1789.

For subsequent amendments, Article Five describes the process of a potential amendment's adoption. Proposals to adopt an amendment may be called either by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress or by a national convention as a result of resolutions adopted by two-thirds (presently at least 34 out of 50) of the states' legislatures. For an amendment to be adopted, three-quarters of the states (presently at least 38 out of 50) must ratify the amendment either by a vote of approval in each state's legislature or by state ratifying conventions – Congress may specify which method must be used to ratify the amendment. Congress may also set a deadline by which the threshold for adoption must be met.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Glossary of terms relating to Treaty actions". United Nations. 
  2. ^ An example for such a treaty can be seen in the Convention on Cluster Munition. It will enter into force as soon as it has been ratified by at least 30 states. See Article 17 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
  3. ^ United Nations Treaty Collection, Treaty Reference Guide(1999)
  4. ^ U.S. Const. art. VII.

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratification — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
14962 videos foundNext > 

The Constitution Ratification Debate

American Government Project: Feds vs. Anti-Feds.

Constitutional History Lecture 8: Ratification

Professor Brion McClanahan, author of The Founding Fathers' Guide to the Constitution, discusses the ratification of the Constitution. He covers the critical...

The Battle for the Ratification of the Constitution- National History Day 2011

Project for NJ History Day Theme: Debate and Diplomacy.

Ratification: Struggle for the Constitution

A preview of an upcoming TV documentary about the ratification of the US Constitution. This sneak peek features eminent historians Christopher Collier, Micha...

Operation Ratification - Rotten Apple

Traccia n.8 Artista:Guru, Operation Ratification Album:Guru Presents Ill Kid Records Anno:1995.

Pauline Maier: Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

UNE's Center for Global Humanities and its founding director, Anouar Majid, host Pauline Maier to discuss her book, *Ratification: The People Debate the Cons...

The Constitution, from Drafting to Ratification: A User's Guide

A little more than a decade after the founding of the United States, things weren't going incredibly smoothly. People like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton actually wanted to create a whole...

Roundtable on U.S. Ratification of CEDAW

This UN Commission on the Status of Women parallel event was hosted by the American Civil Liberties Union and cosponsored by the Center for Womens Global Lea...

Constitutional Ratification

Summary & Questions: http://goo.gl/4yFw1b Unit 2: Lesson 4 Table of Contents: 00:08 - Main Ideas 00:28 - RATIFICATION 00:52 - End of the Convention 01:38 - R...

Don Casey - Ratification of Commencement

10/10/12 - Don Casey speaks in Staunton, VA about Liberty and the Law, hosted by the Constitution Party. In this segment he explains the 4 legs of a controve...

14962 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Ratification" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Ratification

You can talk about Ratification with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!