digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















Ratification is a principal's approval of an act of its agent where the agent lacked authority to legally bind the principal.[clarification needed] The term applies to private contract law, international treaties, and constitutions in federations such as the United States and Canada.

Private law[edit]

In contract law, the need for ratification can arise in two ways: where the agent attempts to bind the principal despite lacking the authority to do so, and where the principal authorizes the agent to make an agreement, but reserves the right to approve it. An example of the first situation is where an employee not normally responsible for procuring supplies contracts to do so on the employer's behalf. The employer's choice on discovering the contract is to ratify it or to repudiate it.

The other situation is common in trade union collective bargaining agreements. The Union authorizes one or more people to negotiate and sign an agreement with management. A collective bargaining agreement can not become legally binding until the union members ratify the agreement. If they do not approve it, the agreement is of no effect, and negotiations resume.

Ratification of an international treaty[edit]

Main article: Treaty

The ratification of international treaties is usually accomplished by filing instruments of ratification as provided for in the treaty.[1] In most democracies, the legislature authorizes the government to ratify treaties through standard legislative procedures (i.e., passing a bill).

United Kingdom[edit]

In the UK, treaty ratification was a Royal Prerogative, exercised by Her Majesty on the advice of her Government. But, by a convention called the Ponsonby Rule, treaties were usually placed before parliament for 21 days before ratification. This was put onto a statutory footing by the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.

United States[edit]

In the US, the treaty power is a coordinated effort between the Executive branch and the Senate. The President may form and negotiate, but the treaty must be advised and consented to by a two-thirds vote in the Senate. Only after the Senate approves the treaty can the President ratify it. Once a treaty is ratified, it becomes binding on all the states under the Supremacy Clause. While the United States House of Representatives does not vote on it at all, the requirement for Senate advice and consent to ratification makes it considerably more difficult in the US than in other democratic republics to rally enough political support for international treaties. Also, if implementation of the treaty requires the expenditure of funds, the House of Representatives may be able to block, or at least impede, such implementation by refusing to vote for the appropriation of the necessary funds.

In the US, the President usually submits a treaty to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) along with an accompanying resolution of ratification or accession. If the treaty and resolution receive favorable committee consideration (a committee vote in favor of ratification or accession) the treaty is then forwarded to the floor of the full U.S. Senate for such a vote. The treaty or legislation does not apply until it has been ratified. A multilateral agreement may provide that it will take effect upon its ratification by less than all of the signatories.[2] Even though such a treaty takes effect, it does not apply to signatories that have not ratified it. Accession has the same legal effect as ratification. Accession is a synonym for ratification for treaties already negotiated and signed by other states.[3] An example of a treaty to which the U.S. Senate did not advise and consent to ratification is the Treaty of Versailles, which was part of the resolution of the First World War.


In Australia, power to enter into treaties is an executive power within Section 61 of the Australian Constitution. Thus the Australian Federal Government may enter into a binding treaty without seeking parliamentary approval. However, implementation of treaties does require legislation by Federal parliament, following Section 51(xxix) of the Australian Constitution and signed by the Governor-General of Australia.


In Japan, in principle both houses of the parliament (the National Diet) must approve the treaty for ratification. In the event the Upper House (House of Councilors) rejects a treaty approved by the Lower House (House of Representatives) and a joint committee of both houses cannot come to agreement on amendments to the original text of the treaty, or the Upper House fails to decide on a treaty for more than thirty (30) days, by the Constitutional supremacy of the House of Representatives the decision by the Lower House will be regarded as the vote of the National Diet approving the ratification. The approved treaty will then be promulgated into law by the Constitutional act of the Emperor.

Ratification of a constitution[edit]

Federations usually require the support of both the federal government and some given percentage of the constituent governments for amendments to the federal constitution to take effect.

Ratification in the United States Constitution[edit]

Article Seven of the constitution of the United States describes the process by which the entire document was to become effective. It required that conventions of nine of the thirteen original States ratify the constitution. If fewer than thirteen states ratified document, it would become effective only among the states ratifying it.[4] New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify, doing so on June 21, 1788, but, as a practical matter, it was decided to delay implementation of the new government until New York and Virginia could be persuaded to ratify. Congress intended that New York City should be the first capital, and that George Washington, of Mount Vernon, Virginia, should be the first President, and both of those things would have been somewhat awkward if either New York or Virginia were not part of the new government. Ratification by those states was secured, and the government under the Constitution began on March 4, 1789.

For subsequent amendments, Article Five describes the process of a potential amendment's adoption. Proposals to adopt an amendment may be called either by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress or by a national convention as a result of resolutions adopted by two-thirds (presently at least 34 out of 50) of the states' legislatures. For an amendment to be adopted, three-quarters of the states (presently at least 38 out of 50) must ratify the amendment either by a vote of approval in each state's legislature or by state ratifying conventions – Congress may specify which method must be used to ratify the amendment. Congress may also set a deadline by which the threshold for adoption must be met.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "Glossary of terms relating to Treaty actions". United Nations. 
  2. ^ An example for such a treaty can be seen in the Convention on Cluster Munition. It will enter into force as soon as it has been ratified by at least 30 states. See Article 17 of the Convention on Cluster Munitions.
  3. ^ United Nations Treaty Collection, Treaty Reference Guide(1999)
  4. ^ U.S. Const. art. VII.

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratification — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.

8313 news items

Sacramento Bee

Sacramento Bee
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:37:30 -0700

“(I)t appears that the firewalls and/or spam filters of some State departments are blocking e-mail messages originating from Votenet (caseelections@votenet.com) that contain the tentative agreement ratification ballot,” the union's board said in a ...
Sacramento Bee
Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:52:30 -0700

A revamped casino compact between the Brown administration and a prominent San Diego County tribe seems headed for quick ratification after brief informational hearings this week and Assembly approval Friday morning. The renegotiated compact ...


Fri, 22 Aug 2014 11:22:30 -0700

A week after voting was supposed to be held on the constitution and implementation plan, the USACA website remains silent on the status of the ratification. In an e-mailed communication, a board member of USACA noted that feedback was gathered from the ...


Thu, 21 Aug 2014 02:11:15 -0700

Cabinet approves ratification of Grand Inga Treaty. FILE PIC: The Minister in the Presidency, Mr Jeff Radebe. Picture Michel Bega. Cabinet has approved the ratification of the Grand Inga Treaty with the Democratic Republic of Congo, Minister in the ...


Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:52:30 -0700

THE Cabinet has approved the ratification of the Grand Inga Treaty with the Democratic Republic of Congo, which will allow for the construction of the first phase of the huge hydroelectric project on the Congo River. The treaty, which was signed ...


The Oregonian - OregonLive.com
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:40:20 -0700

Neither the longshore union nor the three grain-handling companies who operate in the Portland area will talk publicly about the tentative contract they agreed to late Monday night. Nobody wants to affect the outcome of the union's ratification vote ...

Democracy & Freedom Watch

Democracy & Freedom Watch
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:21:21 -0700

TBILISI, DFWatch–Two members of the European Parliament on Wednesday called on member states to accelerate the ratification of the association agreements signed with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine in June. Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine signed ...
Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:37:30 -0700

President of Parliamentarians for Global Action and New Zealand MP Ross Robertson today addressed a celebration to mark New Zealand's imminent ratification of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which is expected within the next few weeks. Jointly hosted by ...

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Ratification

You can talk about Ratification with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!