digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

The absolute value of the Gamma function. This shows that a function becomes infinite at the poles (left). On the right, the Gamma function does not have poles, it just increases quickly.

In the mathematical field of complex analysis, a pole of a meromorphic function is a certain type of singularity that behaves like the singularity of  \scriptstyle \frac{1}{z^n} at z = 0. For a pole of the function f(z) at point a the function approaches infinity as z approaches a.

Contents

Definition [edit]

Formally, suppose U is an open subset of the complex plane C, a is an element of U and f : U \ {a} → C is a function which is holomorphic over its domain. If there exists a holomorphic function g : UC and a positive integer n, such that for all z in U \ {a}

 f(z) = \frac{g(z)}{(z-a)^n}

holds, then a is called a pole of f. The smallest such n is called the order of the pole. A pole of order 1 is called a simple pole.

A few authors allow the order of a pole to be zero, in which case a pole of order zero is either a regular point or a removable singularity. However, it is more usual to require the order of a pole to be positive.

From above several equivalent characterizations can be deduced:

If n is the order of pole a, then necessarily g(a) ≠ 0 for the function g in the above expression. So we can put

f(z) = \frac{1}{h(z)}

for some h that is holomorphic in an open neighborhood of a and has a zero of order n at a. So informally one might say that poles occur as reciprocals of zeros of holomorphic functions.

Also, by the holomorphy of g, f can be expressed as:

f(z) = \frac{a_{-n}}{ (z - a)^n } + \cdots + \frac{a_{-1}}{ (z - a) } + \sum_{k\, \geq \,0} a_k (z - a)^k.

This is a Laurent series with finite principal part. The holomorphic function \scriptstyle \sum_{k\,\ge\,0} a_k(z\, - \,a)^k (on U) is called the regular part of f. So the point a is a pole of order n of f if and only if all the terms in the Laurent series expansion of f around a below degree −n vanish and the term in degree −n is not zero.

Pole at infinity [edit]

A complex function can be defined as having a pole at the point at infinity. In this case U has to be a neighborhood of infinity, such as the exterior of any closed ball. To use the previous definition, a meaning for g being holomorphic at ∞ is needed. Alternately, a definition can be given starting from the definition at a finite point by suitably mapping the point at infinity to a finite point. The map \scriptstyle z \mapsto \frac{1}{z} does that. Then, by definition, a function f holomorphic in a neighborhood of infinity has a pole at infinity if the function \scriptstyle f(\frac{1}{z}) (which will be holomorphic in a neighborhood of \scriptstyle z = 0), has a pole at \scriptstyle z = 0, the order of which will be regarded as the order of the pole of f at infinity.

Pole of a function on a complex manifold [edit]

In general, having a function \scriptstyle f:\; M\, \rightarrow \,\mathbb{C} that is holomorphic in a neighborhood, \scriptstyle U, of the point \scriptstyle a, in the complex manifold M, it is said that f has a pole at a of order n if, having a chart \scriptstyle \phi:\; U\, \rightarrow \,\mathbb{C}, the function \scriptstyle f\, \circ \,\phi^{-1}:\; \mathbb{C}\, \rightarrow \,\mathbb{C} has a pole of order n at \scriptstyle \phi(a) (which can be taken as being zero if a convenient choice of the chart is made). ] The pole at infinity is the simplest nontrivial example of this definition in which M is taken to be the Riemann sphere and the chart is taken to be \scriptstyle \phi(z)\, = \,\frac{1}{z}.

Examples [edit]

  • The function
f(z) = \frac{3}{z}
has a pole of order 1 or simple pole at \scriptstyle z\, = \,0.
  • The function
f(z) = \frac{z+2}{(z-5)^2(z+7)^3}
has a pole of order 2 at \scriptstyle z\, = \,5 and a pole of order 3 at \scriptstyle z\, = \,-7.
  • The function
f(z) = \frac{z-4}{e^z-1}
has poles of order 1 at \scriptstyle z\, = \,2\pi ni\text{ for } n\, = \,\dots,\, -1,\, 0,\, 1,\, \dots. To see that, write \scriptstyle e^z in Taylor series around the origin.
  • The function
f(z) = z
has a single pole at infinity of order 1.

Terminology and generalisations [edit]

If the first derivative of a function f has a simple pole at a, then a is a branch point of f. (The converse need not be true).

A non-removable singularity that is not a pole or a branch point is called an essential singularity.

A complex function which is holomorphic except for some isolated singularities and whose only singularities are poles is called meromorphic.

See also [edit]

External links [edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pole_(complex_analysis) — Please support Wikipedia.
A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
781 videos foundNext > 

Complex Analysis: Orders of Zeros and Poles

Mod-1 Lec-6 Zeros, Singularities and Poles

Lecture series on Mathematics-II by Dr.Tanuja Srivastava, Department of Mathematics, IIT Roorkee. For more details on NPTEL visit http://nptel.iitm.ac.in.

2553 Math II lecture 14 chapter 6.4 zeros and poles part 4-4.avi

Complex Analysis, zeros and poles, essential singularity, removable singularity, simple pole, pole of order n.

Complex Analysis: Residue Formula for Poles

2553 Math II lecture 14 chapter 6.4 zeros and poles part 3-4.avi

Complex Analysis, zeros and poles, essential singularity, removable singularity, simple pole, pole of order n.

2553 Math II lecture 14 chapter 6.4 zeros and poles part 2-4.avi

Complex Analysis, zeros and poles, essential singularity, removable singularity, simple pole, pole of order n.

2553 Math II lecture 14 chapter 6.4 zeros and poles part 1-4.avi

Complex Analysis, zeros and poles, essential singularity, removable singularity, simple pole, pole of order n.

MH2801 Calculating Residues at Poles

In this video segment, I show the standard shortcut for calculating the residue at a given pole, of order 1, as well as of order m.

Part I: Complex Variables, Lec 4: Sequences and Series

Part I: Complex Variables, Lecture 4: Sequences and Series Instructor: Herbert Gross View the complete course: http://ocw.mit.edu/RES18-008F11 License: Creat...

2553 Math II lecture 14 chapter 6.5 residues and residue theorem part 4-5.avi

Complex Analysis, Residues, Cauchy Residue Theorem, simple pole, pole of order n.

781 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Pole (complex analysis)" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Pole (complex analysis)

You can talk about Pole (complex analysis) with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!