digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Not to be confused with Plant breeders' rights.

Plant rights are rights to which plants may be entitled. Such issues are often raised in connection with discussions about human rights, animal rights, biocentrism, or sentiocentrism.

Philosophy[edit]

On the question of whether animal rights can be extended to plants, philosopher Tom Regan argues that animals acquire rights due to being aware, what he calls "subjects-of-a-life". He argues that this does not apply to plants, and that even if plants did have rights, abstaining from eating meat would still be moral due to the use of plants to rear animals.[1] According to philosopher Michael Marder, the idea that plants should have rights derives from "plant subjectivity", which is distinct from human personhood.[2][3][4][5][6] Philosopher Paul Taylor holds that all life has inherent worth and argues for respect for plants, but does not assign them rights.[7] Christopher D. Stone, the son of investigative journalist I. F. Stone, proposed in a 1972 paper titled "Should Trees Have Standing?" that if corporations are assigned rights, so should natural objects such as trees.[8][9]

Whilst not appealing directly to "rights", Matthew Hall has argued that plants should be included within the realm of human moral consideration. His "Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany" discusses the moral background of plants in western philosophy and contrasts this with other traditions, including indigenous cultures, which recognise plants as persons—active, intelligent beings that are appropriate recipients of respect and care.[10] Hall backs up his call for the ethical consideration of plants with arguments based on plant neurobiology, which says that plants are autonomous, perceptive organisms capable of complex, adaptive behaviours, including the recognition of self/non-self.

Scientific arguments[edit]

In the study of plant physiology, plants are understood to have mechanisms by which they recognize environmental changes. This definition of plant perception differs from the notion that plants are capable of feeling emotions, an idea also called plant perception. The latter concept, along with plant intelligence, can be traced to 1848, when Gustav Theodor Fechner, a German experimental psychologist, suggested that plants are capable of emotions, and that one could promote healthy growth with talk, attention, and affection.[11] The Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology analyzed scientific data on plants, and concluded in 2009 that plants are entitled to a certain amount of "dignity", but "dignity of plants is not an absolute value."[12]

Legal arguments[edit]

When challenged by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to become vegetarian, Timothy McVeigh argued that "plants are alive too, they react to stimuli (including pain); have circulation systems, etc".[13][14] The Animal Liberation Front argues that there is no evidence that plants can experience pain, and that to the extent they respond to stimuli, it is like a device such as a thermostat responding to sensors.[15]

Justice William O. Douglas, author of a noted dissent about the legal standing of plants

In his dissent to the 1972 Sierra Club v. Morton decision by the United States Supreme Court, Justice William O. Douglas wrote about whether plants might have legal standing:

Inanimate objects are sometimes parties in litigation. A ship has a legal personality, a fiction found useful for maritime purposes... So it should be as respects valleys, alpine meadows, rivers, lakes, estuaries, beaches, ridges, groves of trees, swampland, or even air that feels the destructive pressures of modern technology and modern life...The voice of the inanimate object, therefore, should not be stilled.

Samuel Butler's Erewhon contains a chapter, "The Views of an Erewhonian Philosopher Concerning the Rights of Vegetables".[16]

The Swiss Constitution contains a provision requiring "account to be taken of the dignity of creation when handling animals, plants and other organisms", and the Swiss government has conducted ethical studies pertaining to how the dignity of plants is to be protected.[17] The single-issue Party for Plants entered candidates in the 2010 parliamentary election in the Netherlands.[18] Such concerns have been criticized as evidence that modern culture is "causing us to lose the ability to think critically and distinguish serious from frivolous ethical concerns".[19]

In 2012 a river in New Zealand was legally declared a person with standing (via guardians) to bring legal actions to protect its interests.[20]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Regan, Tom (2003). Animal rights, human wrongs: an introduction to moral philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 101. ISBN 0-7425-3354-9. 
  2. ^ http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/3/1/16/pdf
  3. ^ Marder, Michael (2013). Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-16125-1.  http://www.amazon.com/Plant-Thinking-A-Philosophy-Vegetal-Life/dp/0231161255/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1358962348&sr=8-1&keywords=plant+thinking
  4. ^ Marder, Michael (April 28, 2012). "If Peas Can Talk, Should We Eat Them?". The New York Times. 
  5. ^ Marder, Michael (May 8, 2012). "Is Plant Liberation on the Menu?". The New York Times. 
  6. ^ http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/01/2013120141156284755.html
  7. ^ Vesilind, P. Aarne; Gunn, Alastair S. (1998). Engineering, ethics, and the environment. Cambridge University Press. p. 94. ISBN 0-521-58918-5. 
  8. ^ Stone, Christopher D. (2010). Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment (Third ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-973607-3. 
  9. ^ Stone, Christopher D. (1972). "Should Trees Have Standing--Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects". Southern California Law Review 45: 450–87. 
  10. ^ Hall, Matthew (2011). Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. SUNY Press. ISBN 1-4384-3428-6. 
  11. ^ Michael Heidelberger Nature from within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and his psychophysical worldview 2004, p. 54
  12. ^ Koechlin, Florianne (January 2009). "The dignity of plants". Plant Signaling & Behavior 4 (1): 78–79. doi:10.4161/psb.4.1.7315. Retrieved December 2012. 
  13. ^ McVeigh to PeTA: "Where Do You Draw the Line?", Fur Commission, May 7, 2001 
  14. ^ Grove, Lloyd (April 17, 2001). "The Reliable Source". Washington Post. p. C3. Retrieved August 8, 2010. 
  15. ^ "Isn't it hypocritical to kill and eat plants?", FAQs Insects, Plants, Animal Liberation Front 
  16. ^ Butler, Samuel, "The Views of an Erewhonian Philosopher Concerning the Rights of Vegetables", Erewhon 
  17. ^ Florianne Koechlin (January 2009), The dignity of plants 4 (1), Plant Signal Behav., pp. 78–79, PMC 2634081, PMID 19568336 
  18. ^ Berkowitz, Ben (March 29, 2010). "Plant rights party to contest next Dutch election". Reuters. Retrieved August 7, 2010. 
  19. ^ Smith, Wesley J. (May 12, 2008), The Silent Scream of the Asparagus 13 (33), Weekly Standard 
  20. ^ Vines T, Bruce A Faunce TA. 'Planetary Medicine and the Waitangi Tribunal Whanganui River Report.' Journal of Law and Medicine 2013; 20: 528 available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2235935 (accessed 28 March 2013)

External links[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant_rights — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

The Silent Pain: The Fight for Plant Rights

Brought to you by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Plants, this is a documentary showing all the atrocities of plant suffering. It also contains a pla...

A Vegetarian's Nightmare or A Dissertation on Plants Rights

Nobody does cowboy poetry like Baxter Black...wait...does anyone else do cowboy poetry but Baxter Black? This is hilarious! :) Black, Baxter, perf. 1987. Joh...

Plant Rights

Plant rights my apply to some wacky cultures, but the "Cry of the carrots" and the screams of the weeds matter not to this guy.

Plant Breeders' Rights (short version)

Plant Breeders' Rights is necessary for the protection of varieties. In this film by Naktuinbouw it becomes clear what the benefits are of this form of intel...

J-Dubbz and K-Swagg In an old school adventure: Plant Rights

Hey guys we are back and ready for business. But while we're filming stuff right now, we had to start things off with this old video i dug up of Jordan and M...

Spoor & Fisher | What are Plant Breeders Rights?

David Cochrane - A partner at Spoor & Fisher explains Plant Breeders Rights.

Rights, Law and Religion in a Liberal Society: Part 2 - Lord Plant

An all encompassing examination of Religion's place in a liberal society: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/rights-law-and-religion-in-a-liberal-s...

Rights and Liberal Interventionism in International Affairs - Professor The Lord Plant of Highfield

Can a country ever be justly invaded? How would this be achieved and who decides?: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/rights-and-liberal-interventi...

Mario Super Sluggers Episode 6 "Piranha Plant rights"

Piranha plants should have rights!

Rights, Law & Religion in a Liberal Society - Professor the Lord Plant

Lord Plant examines the issue of identity and religion before the law in a liberal society: http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/rights-law-and-relig...

1000000 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Plant rights" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Plant rights

You can talk about Plant rights with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!