digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Owen Jay Gingerich (born 1930) is a former Research Professor of Astronomy and of the History of Science at Harvard University, and a senior astronomer emeritus at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. In addition to his research and teaching, he has written many books on the history of astronomy.

Gingerich is also a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Philosophical Society, and the International Academy of the History of Science. A committed Christian, he has been active in the American Scientific Affiliation, a society of evangelical scientists,[1] and is on the Templeton Foundation’s Board of Trustees.[2]

Early life[edit]

Gingerich was born to a Mennonite family in Washington, Iowa, but was raised on the prairies of Kansas where he first became interested in astronomy. His father, Melvin Gingerich, taught at Bethel College in North Newton, Kansas, from 1941 to 1947, when he took a job at Goshen College in Indiana. When his family relocated, Owen Gingerich began attending Goshen College without having graduated from high school, having just completed his junior year.[3] He continued his studies at Harvard University. In 2004, Newton High School awarded him an honorary high school diploma.[3]

Career and contributions[edit]

Due largely to Gingerich’s work, De revolutionibus (here the cover of the 2nd edition of 1566, Basel) has been researched and cataloged better than any first-edition historical text except for the original Gutenberg Bible

Gingerich was eventually led to teach astronomy at Harvard where his lectures became noted for attention-getting devices. Amongst these was propelling himself out of the classroom with a fire extinguisher to demonstrate Newton’s third law of motion and dressing up like a sixteenth-century Latin scholar.[4] He also is associated with the Smithsonian and served as chairman of the International Astronomical Union’s Planet Definition Committee, which was charged with updating the astronomical definition of planet to reflect recent discoveries such as Eris.

The seven-member committee drafted a definition which preserved Pluto’s status by only requiring a planet to be (1) large enough to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape) and (2) orbiting a star without itself being a star. This proposal was criticized by many for weakening the meaning of the term. The eventual definition adopted by the IAU added an additional requirement, that a body must have cleared its neighborhood of all other sizable objects, language that Gingerich was “not at all pleased” with.[5]

In addition to astronomical research, he has also studied the history of astronomy. In the 1950s, he researched Charles Messier’s life and the Messier Catalog. Gingerich found notes by Messier on two additional Objects, discovered by Pierre Méchain, which he added to the Messier Catalog: M108 (NGC 3556) and M109 (NGC 3992). He investigated the missing Messier Objects, concluding that M91 was probably a comet and that M102 was probably a duplication of M101. The first conclusion was later dismissed as W. C. Williams brought up evidence that M91 is probably NGC 4548, but the second is still open (M102 may be NGC 5866).[6]

Gingerich is a widely recognized authority on both Johannes Kepler and Nicolaus Copernicus, especially in regard to his De revolutionibus orbium coelestium.

In 1959, in chapter II of The Sleepwalkers, titled "The System of Copernicus", Arthur Koestler wrote that: "The book that nobody read – the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres – was and is an all-time worst-seller." After reading in the Royal Observatory in Edinburgh a thoroughly annotated copy previously owned by Erasmus Reinhold,[7] a prominent sixteenth-century German astronomer who worked in Prussia shortly after Copernicus' death there, Gingerich was inspired to check Koestler's claim and to research who had owned and studied the book's first two editions, the only ones prior to the mid-19th century, published in 1543 and 1566 in Nuremberg and Basel respectively. Gingerich also documented where and how the book was censored. Due largely to Gingerich’s work, De revolutionibus has been researched and catalogued better than any first-edition historical text except for the original Gutenberg Bible.[4] His three-decade-long personal survey of Copernicus’ great book De revolutionibus was recounted in The Book Nobody Read, published in 2004 by Walker & Co. That book and the research behind it earned him the Polish government’s Order of Merit in 1981.[8]

Science and religion[edit]

Since he is a Christian as well as a historian of science and a cosmologist, Gingerich has been asked several times to comment on matters concerning the interplay between science and faith. One of these, Intelligent design, he calls an issue with “immense incomprehension from both the friends and foes.” On the one hand, he says that it is unfortunate that there seems to be a knee-jerk reaction among its critics that I.D. is simply Young Earth creationism in disguise. On the other hand, he says that, while I.D. supporters make a good case for a coherent understanding of the nature of the cosmos,

they fall short in providing any mechanisms for the efficient causes that primarily engage scientists in our age. I.D. does not explain the temporal or geographical distribution of species, or the intricate relationships of the DNA coding. I.D. is interesting as a philosophical idea, but it does not replace the scientific explanations that evolution offers.[9]

Gingerich believes “there is a God as a designer, who happens to be using the evolutionary process to achieve larger goals – which are, as far as we human beings can see, [the development of] self-consciousness and conscience.” He has written that “I ... believe in intelligent design, lowercase ‘i’ and ‘d’. But I have trouble with Intelligent Design – uppercase ‘I’ and ‘D’ – a movement widely seen as anti-evolutionist.” He indicated that teleological arguments, such as the apparent fine tuning of the universe, can count as evidence, but not proof, for the existence of God. He said that “a common-sense and satisfying interpretation of our world suggests the designing hand of a superintelligence.”[10]

Accepting the common descent of species, Gingerich is a theistic evolutionist. Therefore, he does not accept metaphysical naturalism, writing that

Most mutations are disasters, but perhaps some inspired few are not. Can mutations be inspired? Here is the ideological watershed, the division between atheistic evolution and theistic evolution, and frankly it lies beyond science to prove the matter one way or the other. Science will not collapse if some practitioners are convinced that occasionally there has been creative input in the long chain of being.[11]

Gingerich’s beliefs have sometimes resulted in criticism from young earth creationists, who dissent from the view that the universe is billions of years old. Gingerich has responded, in part, by saying that “the great tapestry of science is woven together with the question ‘how?’” while the biblical account and faith “addresses entirely different questions: not the how, but the motivations of the ‘Who’.”[1]

Accomplishments and awards[edit]

At Harvard, Gingerich taught “The Astronomical Perspective”, a core science course for non-scientists, which at the time of his retirement in 2000 was the longest-running course under the same management at the University. One semester, when the number of students signing up for the course lagged, Gingerich hired a plane to fly over Harvard Yard with a banner: "Sci A-17. M, W, F. Try it!" The class was filled by the end of that week.[citation needed] In 1984, he won the Harvard-Radcliffe Phi Beta Kappa prize for excellence in teaching, due in part to his creative use of medieval costumes, fire extinguishers, and at least one aircraft.[4]

In addition to over 20 books, Gingerich has published nearly 600 technical or educational articles and reviews, and he has written many other articles for a popular audience. Two anthologies of his essays have been released, The Great Copernicus Chase and Other Adventures in Astronomical History from Cambridge University Press and The Eye of Heaven: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler in the American Institute of Physics.[8]

He has been a councilor of the American Astronomical Society, and helped organize its Historical Astronomy Division. In 2000, he won their Doggett Prize for his contributions to the history of astronomy.[12] He was awarded the Prix Jules Janssen of the French astronomical society in 2006.

Gingerich won the Trotter Prize in 2009. He also gave a lecture called "Mystery in Science, Reason in Religion: How the Two Intersect and Overlap",

Asteroid 2658 Gingerich, discovered on February 13, 1980, at the Harvard College Observatory, was named in his honor.

Personal life[edit]

Gingerich and his wife, Miriam, have been married for over 50 years.[4] They have three sons, Mark, Peter, and Jonathan, as well as three grandchildren named Philip, Yasmin, and Dilara. They enjoy traveling, photography, and collecting both sea shells and rare books.[12] Though they do not own a copy of the first edition of De revolutionibus (they own two second editions[13]), his collection of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century ephemerides (books that give day-by-day positions of the planets) is second only to that of the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris.[3]

Gingerich appears regularly on the Universe, a History Channel series.

Works[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Stephen C. Meyer. "Owen Gingerich". Eternity. May 1986.
  2. ^ Templeton Foundation board of trustees. Accessed Nov. 15, 2006
  3. ^ a b c "Astrophysicist Owen Gingerich to visit Newton, Bethel College". May 19, 2004
  4. ^ a b c d Peter DeMarco. "Book quest took him around the globe". Boston Globe. April 13, 2004
  5. ^ Robert Roy Britt. "Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition". Aug. 24, 2006
  6. ^ Owen Gingerich at SEDS. Accessed 22 Sept. 2006
  7. ^ Michael Cohen, The Book Nobody Read, review, 05 February 2005 [1]
  8. ^ a b Owen Gingerich Harvard faculty web page. Accessed Sept. 22, 2006.
  9. ^ Owen Gingerich. "Taking the ID debate out of pundits’ playbooks". Science & Theology News. Nov. 8, 2005.
  10. ^ Chris Floyd. "Eyes Wide Open: An Interview with Owen Gingerich. Science and Spirit. Accessed Sept. 23, 2006
  11. ^ Jonathan Witt. "Owen Gingerich Encourages Civil ID Debate". Nov. 9, 2005
  12. ^ a b Owen Gingerich at Smithsonian Institution Libraries. Accessed Sept. 22, 2006
  13. ^ Gingerich, O.:The Book Nobody Read, Walker & Co., 2004.

External links[edit]

General[edit]

Essays[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Gingerich — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
299 videos foundNext > 

Interview with Owen Gingerich, part 1

An interview with Owen Gingerich, historian of science and astronomer, filmed by Alan Macfarlane on 31 August 2008. For a higher quality, downloadable, versi...

Astronomer Owen Gingerich discusses spirituality and society

Harvard professor delivers inaugural Robert and Mabel Beggs Lecture.

Galileo and Gingerich

This is the final project that my classmates and I did for our science documentary journalism class. This is about when Galileo confirmed heliocentrism. Prod...

CfA Colloquium - Owen Gingerich, January, 24, 2013

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Colloquium The Greatest Myth in the History of Astronomy Owen Gingerich "But perhaps the theory has too many epic...

Owen Gingerich - Saturday Morning Physics - 11/03/07

Owen Gingerich "Four Myths of the Copernican Revolution" November 3, 2007 170 Dennison Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Darkwood Byte: Dr. Owen Gingerich on Inevitability - Darkwood Brew

In this excerpt for Darkwood Brew, Dr. Owen Gingerich discusses the idea that humans, in one form or another, might have been part of the plan. http://www.da...

"Mercury, Venus, and the Dance of the Planets" with Owen Gingerich - May 17, 2012

On June 5th, 2012, Venus transited the Sun, a phenomenon not to be repeated until December 11, 2117. First observed by Jeremiah Horrocks and his friend Willi...

Was Darwin Right?

On The Nature Of Science - Part 2 Owen Gingerich, Professor Emeritus of Astronomy and History of Science at Harvard University, Senior Astronomer Emeritus at...

Science and Faith: Gingerich

An interview with Owen Gingerich, part 2

An interview with Owen Gingerich, historian of science and astronomer, filmed by Alan Macfarlane on 31 August 2008. For a higher quality, downloadable, versi...

299 videos foundNext > 

2 news items

 
Huffington Post
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:53:47 -0700

... Mary Southard, Gail Worcelo, John Shelby Spong, Matthew Fox, Joan Roughgarden, John Cobb, Philip Clayton, Denis Lamoureux, Karl W. Giberson, Owen Gingerich, Edward B. (Ted) Davis, Brian McLaren, Sally Morgenthaler, Doug Pagitt, Spencer Burke, ...

Protestante Digital

Protestante Digital
Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:09:25 -0700

Desde Newton hasta Einstein, pasando por Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger, Max Planck, Paul Dirac, Paul Davies, John Barrow, John Polkinghorne, Freeman Dyson, Francis Collins, Owen Gingerich, Roger Penrose y otros muchos, han creído que ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Owen Gingerich

You can talk about Owen Gingerich with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!