digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















Organizational retaliatory behavior (ORB) is a form of workplace deviance. ORB is defined in the bottom up sense as an employee's reacting against a perceived injustice from their employer. ORB is also a top down issue occurring when an employee speaks out or acts in an unfavorable way against the employer.

The International Journal of Conflict Management divides ORB into four different conceptual indicators; rule breaking, level or work behavior, affective commitment, and turnover intention. All of these are forms of Workplace Deviance.

Organizational justice and retaliatory behavior[edit]

ORB is the result of perceived injustices in the workplace, and can be categorised into the three following groups:

  1. Interactional justice: An employees evaluation of the perceived fairness of interpersonal treatment from his or her own superiors (Bies and Moag 1986), and includes an organization’s leaders treating employees with respect, dignity, sensitivity and sincerity.
  2. Procedural justice: An employee’s evaluation of the perceived fairness of rules and processes used by the organization to distribute outcomes to all employees within the organization (Thibault and Walker 1975).
  3. Distributive justice: An employee’s perception of the fairness of his or her own outcomes such as pay (Adams 1965).

Employees who feel they are being treated fairly are more likely to be loyal to their companies, have higher morale and increased helping behaviors. Employees who feel there are being treated unfairly tend to have lower morale, higher turnover rates and are more likely to exhibit ORB and another forms of workplace deviance including theft and/or sabotage in attempts to get even with their wrongdoer.

Top down[edit]

The main reason for top down ORB is whistleblowing, and it differs from that of employees. Whilst employees will act out against the organization, employers will act out against the whistle blower by excluding them from meetings, eliminate their perquisites, assignment to less desirable work or to a heavier work load, more harsh criticism, and in certain cases, pressure to drop their lawsuit altogether. These are all forms of punishment to the whistle blower meant to encourage employee silence and to discourage future whistle blowing.

Employers typically will not waste resources retaliating with employees that are young, inexperienced and have no public credibility. Retaliation often occurs against employees with credibility in their field that have stated their claims against the organization publicly.

Legal issues[edit]

Statistics are showing an increase in retaliatory-based lawsuits, nearly doubling since 1992 according to Zink and Gutman. This is believed to be because employers are beginning to understand the full financial costs of employee retaliatory behaviors. Another theory as to why lawsuits are increasing is employees are reporting cases of top down retaliation more due to an increased understanding of employee rights.

Retaliation claims are standardized by the adverse employment clause while states “any action that materially changes the terms, conditions, and privileges or employment”. Validity of retaliation lawsuits are also based on the ‘reasonable person deterrence’ standard from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission compliance manual that states “actions employer behavior is any actions reasonably likely to deter the charging party from engaging in a protected activity”. Deterring actions include: Threats, reprimands, negative performance evaluations, and harassment, suspending or limiting access to an internal grievance, giving and unjustified negative job reference, refusing to provide a job reference, informing an individual’s prospective employer about the individual’s protected activity, and putting an employee under surveillance.

Notable court cases[edit]

  • Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. (1997) Actions designed to interfere with former employee’s prospective employment
  • Winarto v. Toshiba American Electronics Components (2001) Negative changes to performance appraisal
  • EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) vs. Navy Fed. Credit Union (2005) Increased employee surveillance
  • Noviello v. City of Boston (2005) False accusations, forcing an employee to eat alone, suggested shift changes


Scholars Folger and Skarlicki have argued “retaliation may serve the interests of organization members and the organization itself in that employee mistreatment may be prevented by moral watchdogs, whose actual or potential retaliation serves to keep abusive managers in check”.

See also[edit]


1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity and social exchange. Berkowitz, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. Academic Press, NY, 267-299.

2.Anecdotage (2004). Retrieved from http://www.anecdotage.com/index.php?aid=6871 on May 2, 2009.

3. Folger, R. & Skarlicki, D.P. (2004). Beyond Counterproductive Work Behavior: Moral Emotions and Deontic Retaliation vs. Reconciliation. In S. Fox & P.E. Spector, (Eds.), Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of Actors and Targets. Washington DC: APA Press, pp. 83–105.

4. Thibault, J. W., L. Walker. 1975. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

5. Zink, D. L., & Gutman, A. (2005). Statistical trends in private sector employment discrimination suits. In F. J. Landy (Ed.), Employment discrimination litigation: Behavioral, quantitative, and legal perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.


1. Blader, Steven L., Chia-Chi Chang, and Tom R. Tyler. "Procedural Justice and Retaliation in Organizations: Comparing Cross Nationally the Importance of Fair Group Processes." The International Journal of Conflict Management 2(2001): 295-311. Print.

2. Dunleavy, Eric. On the Legal Front: What Is All the Fuss About? . Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology, Inc.. 2 May 2009 <http://www.siop.org/tip/Current/06gutman.aspx>.

3. Fitness, Julie. "Anger in the Workplace: An Emotion Script Approach to Anger Episodes Between Workers and Their Supervisors, Co-Workers, and Subordinates." Journal of Organizational Behavior 21(2000): 147-162. Print.

4. Fox, Suzy. "The Good, the Bad (and this may get Ugly): ." (2005) Web.2 May 2009. <http://www.asppr.org/pdf/fox_aom05_positive_CWB.pdf>.

5. Lim, Vivien K. G.. "The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice ." Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(2002): 675-694. Print.

6. Parmerlee, Marcia A., Janet P. Near, and Tamila C. Jensen. "Whistle-Blowers' Perceptions of Organizational Retaliation ." Administrative Science Quarterly 27(1982): 17-34. Print.

7. Umphress, Elizabeth Eve, Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, Daniel J. Brass, Lotte Scholten, and Edward (Eli) Kass. "The Role of Instrumental and Expressive Social Ties in Employees' Perceptions of ." Organizational Science. 14(2003): 138-753. Print.

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_retaliatory_behavior — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
372 videos foundNext > 

Houston Retaliation Lawyer-Can An Employer's Behavior Can Impact A Retaliation Claim?

Sometimes an employer will engage in positive conduct toward an employee who has previously engaged in protected activity. Can this impact the employee's ret...

N Korea threatens retaliation for UN sanctions

North Korea has reacted defiantly to the U.S.-lead United Nations Security Council's resolution over its recent nuclear test. Pyongyang also focused its frus...

Barack Obama CNN Interview on Syria, Dismisses Assad's Retaliation Threats (10th september 2013)

September 9, 2013 - In an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Monday, President Obama dismissed Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's threats of retaliation if...

Houston Retaliation Lawyer-Does An Employee Have To Go Back To EEOC To Amend Charge?

Sometimes an employee who files a discrimination charge with the EEOC finds himself or herself subsequently fired. Does the employee have to go back to the E...

Justice for Women Stalked in the Workplace and Retaliation by Their Employers

Washington, D.C. - Martin v. Howard University and Alice Gresham Bullock, U.S. Supreme Court No. 08-204. In 1997, Howard University Law Professor Dawn Martin...


Live in Vimaranes Metallum VI - 11-04-2014.

Fired Fiancé of Harassed Employee Can Sue For Retaliation

On Jan. 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP and held that a employer's firing of ...

Collective Animal Behavior in Nature

For CRI presentation, videos selected by Marion Segall.

Today's News Anonymous group attack against Westboro Baptist Church 2012 Anonymous organization

Today's News Anonymous attack against Westboro Baptist Church 2012 Anonymous organization The hacker group Anonymous is back in action. This time they have l...

GTA 5 Funny Moments - WORLDS MOST ANGRIEST KID EVER (GTA 5 Funny Moments Trolling)

Aggression is overt, often harmful, social interaction with the intention of inflicting damage or other unpleasantness upon another individual. It is a virtu...

372 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Organizational retaliatory behavior" right now.


Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Organizational retaliatory behavior

You can talk about Organizational retaliatory behavior with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!