digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

This article is about the definition of necessity according to criminal law. For the concept of necessity in tort, see Necessity (tort). For the concept of necessity in international law, see Military necessity. For logical meanings, see Necessary (disambiguation) and Modal logic.

In U.S. criminal law, necessity may be either a possible justification or an exculpation for breaking the law. Defendants seeking to rely on this defense argue that they should not be held liable for their actions as a crime because their conduct was necessary to prevent some greater harm and when that conduct is not excused under some other more specific provision of law such as self defense. Except for a few statutory exemptions and in some medical cases [1] there is no corresponding defense in English law for murder.[2]

For example, a drunk driver might contend that he drove his car to get away from a kidnap (cf. North by Northwest). Most common law and civil law jurisdictions recognize this defense, but only under limited circumstances. Generally, the defendant must affirmatively show (i.e., introduce some evidence) that (a) the harm he sought to avoid outweighs the danger of the prohibited conduct he is charged with; (b) he had no reasonable alternative; (c) he ceased to engage in the prohibited conduct as soon as the danger passed; and (d) he did not himself create the danger he sought to avoid. Thus, with the "drunk driver" example cited above, the necessity defense will not be recognized if the defendant drove further than was reasonably necessary to get away from the kidnapper, or if some other reasonable alternative was available to him. However case law suggests necessity is narrowed to medical cases.

The political necessity defense saw its demise in the case of United States v. Schoon.[3] In that case, thirty people, including appellants, gained admittance to the IRS office in Tucson, where they chanted "keep America's tax dollars out of El Salvador," splashed simulated blood on the counters, walls, and carpeting, and generally obstructed the office's operation. The court ruled that the elements of necessity did not exist in this case.[4]

General discussion[edit]

As a matter of political expediency, states usually allow some classes of person to be excused from liability when they are engaged in socially useful functions but intentionally cause injury, loss or damage. For example, the fire services and other civil defence organizations have a general duty to keep the community safe from harm. If a fire or flood is threatening to spread out of control, it may be reasonably necessary to destroy other property to form a fire break, or to trespass on land to throw up mounds of earth to prevent the water from spreading. These examples have the common feature of individuals intentionally breaking the law because they believe it to be urgently necessary to protect others from harm, but some states distinguish between a response to a crisis arising from an entirely natural cause (an inanimate force of nature), e.g. a fire from a lightning strike or rain from a storm, and a response to an entirely human crisis. Thus, parents who lack the financial means to feed their children cannot use necessity as a defense if they steal food. The existence of welfare benefits and strategies other than self-help defeat the claim of an urgent necessity that cannot be avoided in any way other than by breaking the law. Further, some states apply a test of proportionality. So the defense would only be allowed where the degree of harm actually caused was a reasonably proportionate response to the degree of harm threatened. This is a legal form of cost–benefit analysis.

Specific jurisdictions[edit]

Denmark and Norway[edit]

Emergency law/right (nødret, nødrett) is the equivalent of necessity in Denmark and Norway.[5][6] It is considered related to but separate from self-defence. Common legal examples of necessity includes: Breaking windows and other objects in order to escape a fire, commandeering a vehicle for emergency ambulance, and ignoring traffic rules while rushing a dying patient to a hospital, and even killing a person who poses an immediate threat to several other people not including yourself. In the last case self-defense laws are not enough, but the case is covered by nødret. Nødret can only be invoked though when no other option is available.

International law[edit]

Customary international law[edit]

Under international law, a customary international obligation or an obligation granted under a bilateral investment treaty may be suspended under the doctrine of necessity. It is "an exception from illegality and in certain cases even as an exception from responsibility." See Continental Casualty Company v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/03/09. In order to invoke the doctrine of necessity: (1) The invoking State must not have contributed to the state of necessity, (2) Actions taken were the only way to safeguard an essential interest from grave and impending danger. Id. at page 72, paragraph 165.

Taiwan, Republic of China[edit]

Necessity defense is possible per Criminal Code[7] and per Administrative Penalty Act.[8]

United States[edit]

In specific states[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  • Christie, The Defense of Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View, (1999) Vol. 48 Duke Law Journal, 975.
  • Fuller, Lon L. The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, (1949) Vol. 62, No. 4 Harvard Law Review [1] and The Case of the Speluncean Explorers: A Fiftieth Anniversary Symposium, (1999) 12 Harvard Law Review 1834.
  • Herman, United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative. Whatever Happened to Federalism? (2002) Vol. 95, No. 1 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 121.
  • Travis, M. The Compulsion Element in a Defence of Necessity (2000) [2]
  1. ^ See Re A (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147
  2. ^ See R v Dudley and Stephens [1884] 14 QBD 273 and R v Howe [1987] 1 AC 417
  3. ^ Cavallaro, James L., Jr. (1993), The demise of the political necessity defense: indirect civil disobedience and United States v. Schoon, University of California Press, ISSN 0008-1221 
  4. ^ U.S. v. Schoon, 939 F2d 826 (July 29, 1991).
  5. ^ StraffelovenRetsinformation
  6. ^ Straffeloven av 2005 § 17
  7. ^ Article 24 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China.
  8. ^ Article 13 of Administrative Penalty Act.

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.

34614 news items

 
NavyTimes.com
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:10:25 -0700

Beneficiaries don't need medical necessity preauthorization to obtain consultation appointments, but in some cases — including invasive surgery — actually moving forward with the procedure itself does require medical necessity preauthorization from ...
 
The Real News Network
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:15:00 -0700

The Necessity for Higher Wages - Heiner Flassbeck on Reality Asserts Itself (4/5 PAUL JAY, SENIOR EDITOR, TRNN: Welcome back to The Real News Network and Reality Asserts Itself. We 'are continuing our series of interviews with Heiner Flassbeck about ...

MSNBC

MSNBC
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 07:58:00 -0700

In theory, Republican policymakers believe interference in the physician-patient relationship is not only big government, but also an outrageous abuse. Nothing, the GOP has said for years, should come between Americans and their doctors, especially not ...
 
Jacksonville Jaguars
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:15:00 -0700

Play fast and protect the team are huge themes around any Jaguars practice, and the league has been gearing that way for some time. The loss of core players can ruin a season, so by necessity, teams have long taken measures to minimize hits to the legs ...
 
C-VILLE Weekly
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:16:32 -0700

City says fence along Corner railroad tracks is safety necessity, but some are skeptical. Tweet. 3 COMMENTS. The City of Charlottesville is installing a seven-foot, $380,000 solid metal fence along a half-mile stretch of railroad tracks near the Corner ...
 
Drinks Business Review
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 05:56:15 -0700

The SMIRNOFF brand adds two new items to the summer-beach bag essentials list with the release of new vodka specialties SMIRNOFF SORBET Light Summer Strawberry and White Peach - the newest additions to its reduced-calorie SMIRNOFF SORBET ...
 
Tulsa World
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:01:56 -0700

When living in an apartment or rental property, you and your personal belongings are only as safe as your most irresponsible neighbor. A 2013 Insurance Information Institute poll conducted by ORC International found that though 96 percent of homeowners ...
 
WCAX
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:18:45 -0700

RAY BROOK, N.Y. - New York State Police say they were justified in a high-speed chase that ended in a deadly crash in Ray Brook. They say Trevor Sisto put people's lives in danger and had to be stopped. But some North Country residents wonder if last ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Necessity

You can talk about Necessity with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!