digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

For the algorithm in computer science, see Miller–Rabin primality test.

The Miller test (also called the Three Prong Obscenity Test) is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited.[1]

History and details[edit]

The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California.[2] It has three parts:

The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied.

The first two prongs of the Miller test are held to the standards of the community, and the last prong is held to what is reasonable to a person of the United States as a whole. The national reasonable person standard of the third prong acts as a check on the community standard of the first two prongs, allowing protection for works that in a certain community might be considered obscene but on a national level might have redeeming value.

For legal scholars, several issues are important. One is that the test allows for community standards rather than a national standard. What offends the average person in Manhattan, Kansas, may differ from what offends the average person in Manhattan, New York.[5] The relevant community, however, is not defined.

Another important issue is that Miller Test asks for an interpretation of what the "average" person finds offensive, rather than what the more sensitive persons in the community are offended by, as obscenity was defined by the previous test, the Hicklin test, stemming from the English precedent.

In practice, pornography showing genitalia and sexual acts is not ipso facto obscene according to the Miller test. For instance, in 2000 a jury in Provo, Utah, took only a few minutes to clear Larry Peterman, owner of a Movie Buffs video store, in Utah County, Utah, a region which had often boasted of being one of the most conservative areas in the United States. Researchers had shown that guests at the local Marriott Hotel were disproportionately large consumers of pay-per-view pornographic material, accessing far more material than the store was distributing.[6]

Criticism[edit]

Less strict standard may lead to greater censorship[edit]

Because it allows for community standards and demands "serious" value, Justice Douglas worried in his dissent that this test would make it easier to suppress speech and expression. Miller replaced a previous test asking whether the speech or expression was "utterly without redeeming social value".[7] As used, however, the test generally makes it difficult to outlaw any form of expression. Many works decried as pornographic have been successfully argued to have some artistic or literary value, most publicly in the context of the National Endowment for the Arts in the 1990s.[8]

Problem of definition[edit]

Critics of obscenity law argue that defining what is obscene is paradoxical, arbitrary, and subjective. They state that lack of definition of obscenity in the statutes, coupled with the existence of hypothetical entities and standards as ultimate arbiters within the Miller test (hypothetical "reasonable persons" and "contemporary community standards") proves that federal obscenity laws are in fact not defined, do not satisfy the vagueness doctrine, and thus are unenforceable and legally dubious.[9]

Problem of jurisdiction in the internet age[edit]

The advent of the Internet has made the "community standards" part of the test even more difficult to judge; as material published on a web server in one place can be read by a person residing anywhere else, there is a question as to which jurisdiction should apply. In United States of America v. Extreme Associates, a pornography distributor from North Hollywood, California, was judged to be held accountable to the community standards applying in western Pennsylvania, where the Third Circuit made its ruling, because the materials were available via Internet in that area. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled in United States v. Kilbride that a "national community standard" should be used for the internet, but this has yet to be upheld at the national level.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Three Prong Obscenity Test", Professionalism in Computing (Virginia Tech), retrieved June 28, 2010 
  2. ^ Text of the decision and dissents, from findlaw.com
  3. ^ The syllabus of the case mentions only sexual conduct, but excretory functions are explicitly mentioned on page 25 of the majority opinion.
  4. ^ This is also known as the (S)LAPS test- [Serious] Literary, Artistic, Political, Scientific.
  5. ^ Godwin, Mike (October 2001). "Standards Issue – The Supreme Court, "community standards," and the Internet". Reason Foundation. Retrieved 11 October 2012. 
  6. ^ Egan, Timothy; Gary Ruskin (24 October 2000). "Wall Street Meets Pornography". 
  7. ^ Roth v. United States, 1957.
  8. ^ "Public Funding of Controversial Art". The First Amendment Center. February 1996. Retrieved 2011-11-16. 
  9. ^ "There is no Such Thing as Obscenity". The Ethical Spectacle. February 1996. 

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.

333 news items

 
Bloomberg
Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:03:45 -0700

Bloomberg's Hannah Elliott and Matt Miller test drive the new Volvo XC90. (Source: Bloomberg). Most Recent Videos. Out On the Open Road Driving Volvo's New XC90 · U.S. Public Spending Skimping on Science and Technology · Commodities at Low: ...

TheWrap

TheWrap
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:55:40 -0700

“Transformers: Age of Extinction” star Nicola Peltz and “Mad Max: Fury Road” actress Courtney Eaton are testing for the coveted title role in Paramount's adaptation of John Green's “Looking for Alaska,” while John D'Leo (“Unbroken”) and Logan Miller ...

Richmond

Richmond
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 20:02:47 -0700

Republican Luke Messer seeks re-election to the United States House of Representatives in District 6. The 45-year-old Messer is challenged by Democrat Susan Hall Heitzman and Libertarian Eric Miller for one of 435 seats in Washington, D.C. The annual ...

crash.net

crash.net
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:15:36 -0800

2014 Moto3 runner-up Jack Miller was left wide-eyed and amazed after his MotoGP debut on LCR Honda's Open class racer. The Australian put in a mammoth day of testing work at Valencia, lapping the Ricardo Tormo circuit 71 times in just a five hour ...

CardPlayer.com

CardPlayer.com
Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:45:00 -0800

I was a physics major in college. Physics is very hard — too hard for me it turned out, and I haven't cracked a physics book since the day I got my degree. One reason it's so hard is that much of it is abstract. You're learning about how the world ...
 
Medscape
Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:41:07 -0700

While a significant percentage of cancer cases have no known cause at all, a number of environmental and behavior factors have been linked to cancer, including tobacco, obesity, asbestos, sunlight, and radiation. What percentage of cancer deaths could ...

Den Of Geek

Den Of Geek
Mon, 28 Jul 2014 23:11:15 -0700

Tim Miller's test footage for Deadpool, starring Ryan Reynolds, has appeared online. At least for now... Somewhat inevitably, this may not stay online for long, but test footage for the long-mooted Deadpool movie has popped up on the internet. This is ...
 
Washington Post
Wed, 01 Jul 2015 14:12:18 -0700

The new legal standard was based on local “community standards” instead of a national legal standard. Under the Miller test, obscenity became an issue for local juries instead of the nine Justices. The Justices then canceled movie night. It is widely ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight