digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Malaysia Agreement
Agreement relating to Malaysia between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore
{{{image_alt}}}
Agreement relating to Malaysia
Drafted 15 November 1961
Signed 9 July 1963
Location London, United Kingdom
Sealed 31 July 1963
Effective 16 September 1963
Signatories Government of United Kingdom
Government of Malaya
Government of North Borneo
Government of Sarawak, and
Government of Singapore
Parties  United Kingdom
 Malaya
North Borneo
Sarawak
 Singapore
Depositary British Government
dated 21 September 1970
The Secretary-General of the  United Nations acting in his capacity as depositary the following:[1]
(English), (French), and (Malay)
Registered Nr. I-10760
Languages English and Malay
Agreement relating to Malaysia between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore at Wikisource

The Malaysia Agreement or the Agreement relating to Malaysia between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Federation of Malaya, North Borneo, Sarawak and Singapore was the agreement which combined North Borneo, Sarawak, and Singapore with the existing Federation of Malaya, the resulting union being named Malaysia.[2][3] Singapore later ceased to be a part of Malaysia, becoming an independent state on 9 August 1965.[4]

Background[edit]

The Malayan Union was established by the British Malaya and comprised the Federated Malay States of Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang; the Unfederated Malay States of Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu, Johor; and the Straits Settlements of Penang and Malacca. It came into being in 1946, through a series of agreements between the United Kingdom and Malayan Union.[5] The Malayan Union was superseded by the Federation of Malaya on 1 February 1948, and achieved independence within the Commonwealth of Nations on 31 August 1957.[3]

After the end of the Second World War, decolonisation became the societal goal of the peoples under colonial regimes aspiring to achieve self-determination hereinafter, the Special Committee on Decolonisation (also known as the U.N. Special Committee of the 24 on Decolonisation, It reflected in the United Nations General Assembly's proclamation on 14 December 1960 of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples hereinafter, the Committee of 24, or simply, the Decolonisation Committee) was established in 1961 by the General Assembly of the United Nations with the purpose of monitoring implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and to make recommendations on its application.[6] The committee is also a successor to the former Committee on Information from Non-Self-Governing Territories. Hoping to speed the progress of decolonisation, the General Assembly had adopted in 1960 the Resolution 1514, also known as the "Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples" or simply "Declaration on Decolonisation". It stated that all people have a right to self-determination and proclaimed that colonialism should be brought to a speedy and unconditional end.[7]

Under the Malaysia Agreement signed between Great Britain and the Federation of Malaya, Britain would enact an Act to relinquish sovereign control over Singapore, Sarawak and North Borneo (now Sabah). This was accomplished through the enactment of the Malaysia Act 1963, clause 1(1) of which states that on Malaysia Day, Her Majesty’s sovereignty and jurisdiction in respect of the new states shall be relinquished so as to vest in the manner agreed[8]

Decolonisation, Self-Determination and Referendum[edit]

The issue of self-determination with respect to the peoples of North Borneo, Sarawak, and Singapore formed the bedrock of yet another challenge to the formation of the Federation of Malaysia. Under the Joint Statement issued by the British and Malayan Federal Governments on 23 November 1961, clause 4 provided: Before coming to any final decision it is necessary to ascertain the views of the peoples. It has accordingly been decided to set up a Commission to carry out this task and to make recommendations ........

In the spirit of ensuring that decolonisation was carried in accordance with the wishes of the peoples of North Borneo, the British Government, working with the Federation of Malaya Government, appointed a Commission of Enquiry for North Borneo and Sarawak in January 1962 to determine if the people supported the proposal to create a Federation of Malaysia. The five-man team, which comprised two Malayans and three British representatives, was headed by Lord Cameron Cobbold.[9]

In Singapore, the People's Action Party (PAP) sought merger with Malaysia on the basis of the strong mandate it obtained during the general elections of 1959 when it won 43 of the 51 seats. However, this mandate became questionable when dissension within the Party led to a split. In July 1961, following a debate on a vote of confidence in the government, 13 PAP Assemblymen were expelled from the PAP for abstaining. They went on to form a new political party, the Barisan Sosialis, the PAP’s majority in the Legislative Assembly was whittled down as they now only commanded 30 of the 51 seats. More defections occurred until the PAP had a majority of just one seat in the Assembly. Given this situation, it would have been impossible to rely on the mandate achieved in 1959 to move forth with merger. A new mandate was necessary, especially since the Barisan argued that the terms of merger offered were detrimental to the Singapore people.

On 11 September 1963, just 4 days before the new Federation of Malaysia was to come into being, the Government of the State of Kelantan sought a declaration that the Malaysia Agreement and Malaysia Act were null and void, or alternatively, that even if they were valid, they did not bind the State of Kelantan. The Kelantan Government argued that both the Malaysia Agreement and the Malaysia Act were not binding on Kelantan on the following grounds that the Malaysia Act in effect abolished the Federation of Malaya and this was contrary to the 1957 Federation of Malaya Agreement that the proposed changes required the consent of each of the constituent states of the Federation of Malaya – including Kelantan – and this had not been obtained

Documents[edit]

The Malaysia Agreement lists annexes of

Annex A: Malaysia Bill
               First Schedule—Insertion of new Articles in Constitution
               Second Schedule—Section added to Eighth Schedule to Constitution
               Third Schedule—Citizenship (amendment of Second Schedule to Constitution)
               Fourth Schedule—Special Legislative Lists for Borneo States and Singapore
               Fifth Schedule—Additions for Borneo States to Tenth Schedule (Grants and assigned revenues) to Constitution
               Sixth Schedule—Minor and consequential amendments of Constitutions
Annex B: The Constitution of the State of Sabah
               The Schedule—Forms of Oaths and Affirmations
Annex C: The Constitution of the State of Sarawak
               The Schedule—Forms of Oaths and Affirmations
Annex D: The Constitution of the State of Singapore
               First Schedule—Forms of Oaths and Affirmations
               Second Schedule—Oath of Allegiance and Loyalty
               Third Schedule—Oath as Member of the Legislative Assembly
Annex F: Agreement of External Defence and Mutual Assistance
Annex G: North Borneo (Compensation and Retiring benefits) Order in Council, 1963
Annex H: Form of public officers agreements in respect of Sabah and Sarawak
Annex I: Form of public officers agreements in respect of Singapore
Annex J: Agreement between the Governments of the Federation of Malaya and Singapore on common and financial arrangements
               Annex to Annex J—Singapore customs ordinance
Annex K: Arrangements with respect to broadcasting and television in Singapore

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ See : United Nations General Assembly Resolution 97 (1)
  2. ^ See: The UK Statute Law Database: the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom Malaysia Act 1963
  3. ^ a b See: The UK Statute Law Database: the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom Federation of Malaya Independence Act 1957 (c. 60)
  4. ^ See: the Independence of Singapore Agreement 1965 and the Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom Singapore Act 1966.
  5. ^ See: Cabinet Memorandum by the Secretary of State for the Colonies. 21 February 1956 Federation of Malaya Agreement
  6. ^ See: the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonisation - Official Website
  7. ^ See: History of U.N. Decolonisation Committee - Official U.N. Website
  8. ^ See: Section 1(1), Malaysia Act 1963, Chapter 35 (UK).
  9. ^ Cobbold was Governor of the Bank of England from 1949 to 1961. The other members were Wong Pow Nee, Chief Minister of Penang, Mohammed Ghazali Shafie, Permanent Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Anthony Abell, former Governor or Sarawak and David Watherston, former Chief Secretary of the Federation of Malaya.

External links[edit]

Further reading[edit]

Allen, J. de V.; Stockwell, Anthony J. (1980). Wright., Leigh R., ed. A collection of treaties and other documents affecting the states of Malaysia 1761-1963. Oceana Pubns. ISBN 978-0379007817. 


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Agreement — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
249870 videos foundNext > 

Revisiting Malaysia Agreement 1963 Datuk Jeffery 1

After 1965 - Is Malaysia Agreement 1963 Still Valid?

Part 3 of 4: Ex Chief Minister of Sabah, Datuk Seri Panglima Yong Teck Lee's point of view at UBF fuction. The four constitutional documents and/or constitut...

Mesej YB.Datuk Dr.Jeffrey G.Kitingan: Review Malaysia Agreement 1963

Sebarkan mesej YB.Datuk Dr.Jeffrey G.kitingan... Dalam video ini, beliau menyampaikan mesejnya tentang mengapa semua pemimpin dalam bn mahupun pr HARUS dan M...

Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Datuk Seri Yong Teck Lee

Second of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented ...

Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan

First of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented a...

Sipaun: Malaysia Agreement should be abrogated

Former Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) vice chairperson Simon Sipaun believes that the Malaysia Agreement should be abrogated following the separation of S...

Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - Patrick Anek Uren

Third of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presented a...

Kuching Forum on Malaysia Agreement - P. Waythamoorthy

The last of five videos summarising the presentations during the Kuching Forum (27/04/2014). Permission is required from the authors of these papers presente...

The Malaysia Agreement for Asylum Seekers

Senator Doug Cameron speaks in the Senate about his views on asylum seekers, the need to establish a compassionate and humane processing system and ensure pe...

Malaysia agreement 'one step' in the process

The Federal Government's asylum seeker deal with Malaysia has drawn criticism from both the Opposition and the Greens.

249870 videos foundNext > 

21 news items

The Rakyat Post

The Rakyat Post
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:40:52 -0700

The 1963 Malaysia Agreement failed to live up to its purpose, a Sabahan politician and a human rights activist claimed. State Reform Party (STAR) chief Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan said the reality in Sabah and Sarawak now was different from what was ...
 
Daily Express
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 07:03:45 -0700

KOTA KINABALU: Parliament must consider accepting a motion to review the Malaysia Agreement 1963 since the topic on Sabah's and Sarawak's status in the federation has become a hotly debated issue lately. Speaking at the Forum and Dialogue – Sabah ...

Free Malaysia Today

Daily Express
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:18:11 -0700

He said this is because the Oath Stone and inscription on it is the only constitutionally accepted form of documentation pertaining to the formation of Malaysia aside from the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and all the other documents that are annexed to the ...

Free Malaysia Today

Free Malaysia Today
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 21:13:16 -0700

... the Federal Constitution, the argument that North Borneo and Sarawak were supposed to be equal partners with the peninsula and not the Federation's 12th and 13th states, the Malaysia Agreement 1963, the 20/18 Points, and Batu Sumpah, among others.

Free Malaysia Today

Free Malaysia Today
Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:01:44 -0700

... not familiar with Borneo rights issues, despite being a lawyer, and not very articulate when he finds something to latch on. He has a lot to learn. His take on the Malaysia Agreement including in Parliament, for example, is flawed and wouldn't win ...
 
The Malaysian Insider
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:02:33 -0700

The goals must be in accordance with and taking into account the pillars of the nation: federal constitution, Malaysia Agreement, Rukunegara, social contract, history, culture, etc. - There are many aspects in nation-building. Education is premium ...
 
Free Malaysia Today
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:40:36 -0700

We were still a colony on 22 July 1963 as Sarawak at best achieved only "self-rule" while Britain still controlled its territory. The best proof is - read the Malaysia Agreement which expressly said “The colonies of North Borneo and Sarawak” …. This ...

The Malay Mail Online

The Malay Mail Online
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:03:45 -0700

“But to appease Sabahans, Putrajaya must honor the spirit and intent and letter of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, honouring full autonomy for Sabah and Sarawak. “Failure to do so could see a surge in secessionism,” he said, adding that oil royalty is ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!