digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















The history of ideas is a field of research in history that deals with the expression, preservation, and change of human ideas over time. The history of ideas is a sister-discipline to, or a particular approach within, intellectual history. Work in the history of ideas may involve interdisciplinary research in the history of philosophy, the history of science, or the history of literature. In Sweden, the history of ideas and science (Idé- och lärdomshistoria) has been a distinct university subject since 6 November 1932, when Johan Nordström, a scholar of literature, was appointed professor of the new discipline in a ceremony at Uppsala University (coinciding with that commemorating the 300-year anniversary of the Battle of Lützen). Today, several universities across the world provide courses in this field, usually as part of a graduate programme.

The Lovejoy approach[edit]

The historian Arthur O. Lovejoy (1873–1962) coined the phrase history of ideas and initiated its systematic study[1] in the early decades of the 20th century. Johns Hopkins University was a "fertile cradle" to Lovejoy's history of ideas;[2] he worked there as a professor of history, from 1910 to 1939, and for decades he presided over the regular meetings of the History of Ideas Club.[3] Another outgrowth of his work is the Journal of the History of Ideas.

Aside from his students and colleagues engaged in related projects (such as René Wellek and Leo Spitzer, with whom Lovejoy engaged in extended debates), scholars such as Isaiah Berlin,[4] Michel Foucault, Christopher Hill, J. G. A. Pocock, and others have continued to work in a spirit close to that with which Lovejoy pursued the history of ideas. The first chapter of Lovejoy's book The Great Chain of Being lays out a general overview of what he intended to be the programme and scope of the study of the history of ideas.[1]


Lovejoy's history of ideas takes as its basic unit of analysis the unit-idea, or the individual concept. These unit-ideas work as the building-blocks of the history of ideas: though they are relatively unchanged in themselves over the course of time, unit-ideas recombine in new patterns and gain expression in new forms in different historical eras. As Lovejoy saw it, the historian of ideas had the task of identifying such unit-ideas and of describing their historical emergence and recession in new forms and combinations.

The unit-idea methodology, intended to extract the basic idea within any philosophical work and movement,[1] also has certain defining principles: 1) assumptions, 2) dialectical motives, 3) metaphysical pathos, and 4) philosophical semantics. These different principles define the overarching philosophical movement within which, Lovejoy argues, one can find the unit-idea, which can then be studied throughout the history of that idea.

Modern work[edit]

Quentin Skinner criticizes Lovejoy's "unit-idea" methodology, and he argues that such a "reification of doctrines" has negative consequences.[5] He emphasizes sensitivity to the cultural context of the texts and ideas being analysed. Skinner's own historical methodology is based on J.L. Austin's theory of speech acts. Andreas Dorschel criticizes Skinner's restrictive approach to ideas through verbal language, and points out how ideas can materialize in non-linguistic media or genres such as music and architecture.[6]

Another important development within the study of ideas has been within the academic discipline of Intellectual History. The Harvard historian, Peter Gordon, explains that intellectual history, as opposed to the history of ideas practiced by Lovejoy, studies and deals with ideas within a broader context.[7] Gordon further emphasises that intellectual historians, as opposed to historians of ideas and philosophers (History of Philosophy), "tend to be more relaxed about crossing the boundary between philosophical texts and non-philosophical contexts...[they regard] the distinction between “philosophy” and “non-philosophy” as something that is itself historically conditioned rather than eternally fixed."[7] Therefore, intellectual history, as a means of reproducing a historically valid interpretation of a philosophical argument, tends to implement a contextualist approach when studying ideas and broader philosophical movements.

Foucault's Approach[edit]

Michel Foucault rejects the idea of the traditional way historians go about writing, which is a narrative. He believed that most historians preferred to write about long periods of time instead of digging deeper into a more specific history.[8] Foucault argues that historians should reveal historical descriptions through different perspectives. This is where he comes up with the term “archaeology” for his method of historical writing. His historical method differs from the traditional sense of historical writing and is divided up into four different ideas.

The first is that “archeology” seeks to define the history through philosophical means, which is to say the discourse between thought, representation, and themes. The second is that “archaeology,” the notion of discontinuity assumes a major role in the historical disciplines. The third idea is that “archaeology” does not seek to grasp the moment that history at which the individual and the social are inverted into one another. And finally the fourth point is that “archaeology” does not seek the truth of history, rather it seeks the discourse in it.[9]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b c Arthur Lovejoy: The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (1936), ISBN 0-674-36153-9
  2. ^ Ronald Paulson English Literary History at the Johns Hopkins University in New Literary History, Vol. 1, No. 3, History and Fiction (Spring, 1970), pp. 559–564
  3. ^ Arthur Lovejoy, Essays in the History of Ideas, ISBN 0-313-20504-3
  4. ^ Isaiah Berlin, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, ISBN 0-691-09026-2
  5. ^ Quentin Skinner, "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas," History and Ideas 8.1 (1969), pp. 3-53.
  6. ^ Andreas Dorschel, Ideengeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010. ISBN 978-3-8252-3314-3
  7. ^ a b Peter E. Gordon, "WHAT IS INTELLECTUAL HISTORY? A FRANKLY PARTISAN INTRODUCTION TO A FREQUENTLY MISUNDERSTOOD FIELD." Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts http://history.fas.harvard.edu/people/faculty/documents/pgordon-whatisintellhist.pdf
  8. ^ Felluga, Dino. "Modules on Foucault: On History." Introductory Guide to Critical Theory http://www.purdue.edu/guidetotheory/newhistoricism/modules/foucaulthistory.html
  9. ^ Foucault, Michel. "Archaeology Of Knowledge, Introduction.", edited by A. M. Sherida Smith. Vintage, 1982. http://foucault.info/documents/archaeologyofknowledge/foucault.archaeologyofknowledge.00_intro.html

External links[edit]

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ideas — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.

31 news items


Mon, 28 Jul 2014 07:14:36 -0700

Anniversaries of significant events, whether it be a longtime marriage, the end of a war, or passage of landmark legislation, elicit comment. How and why the event came about, who were the crucial or influential people associated with it, and what were ...
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:30:00 -0700

These bibliographic data are but the tip of the proverbial iceberg, and I wish some young Filipino would undertake a doctorate in book history and write a definitive account of early Filipino printers as the first step in the building of a history of ...

Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)

Chronicle of Higher Education (subscription)
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:07:30 -0700

This is a book by a philosopher who knows the history of ideas as well as anyone working today, written in Blackburn's witty, accessible, self-deprecating style. I recommend it with enthusiasm. With my own tendency toward misanthropy, I closed the book ...
Dissident Voice
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:00:00 -0700

In response to John Andrews' reflections upon my most recent article “The 'People's Thesis' in Environmental History the History of Ideas, and its Relevance to Cultural Studies”, it is apparent that Mr. Andrews did not comprehend the meaning of the ...


Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:23:33 -0700

Among the classical disciplines, jurisprudence is a relevant model for architecture to understand how disciplinarity can hinge on its own history of ideas. In common-law legal systems, the notion of stare decisis (to stand by decisions) defines ...
Dissident Voice
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:52:40 -0700

In the humanistic studies, the chic approach today in analyzing history and/or ideas involves giving a prominent platform to what I refer to as the “people's thesis”. For a discipline such as history, the people's thesis has emerged as social history ...

Daily Sun

Daily Sun
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:26:15 -0700

In his new novel, entitled: “Verses of Uncharted Heaven: The Second Coming of Biafra”, Dr. James Onyebuchi Ile, who teaches Literature and Literary History of Ideas at the Nile University, assigns himself the role of the devil's advocate, the stone in ...

Boston Globe

Boston Globe
Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:47:53 -0700

To uncover the origins of this revolutionary philosophy, Stewart embarks on a deep investigation into the history of ideas. Just as Stephen Greenblatt argued in 2011's historical blockbuster, “The Swerve,'' Stewart cites the the “revival of Epicurean ...

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About History of ideas

You can talk about History of ideas with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!