digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

Three dimensional plot showing the values of the geometric mean of varying x and y values.

In mathematics, the geometric mean is a type of mean or average, which indicates the central tendency or typical value of a set of numbers by using the product of their values (as opposed to the arithmetic mean which uses their sum). The geometric mean is defined as the nth root (where n is the count of numbers) of the product of the numbers.

For instance, the geometric mean of two numbers, say 2 and 8, is just the square root of their product; that is 22 × 8 = 4. As another example, the geometric mean of the three numbers 4, 1, and 1/32 is the cube root of their product (1/8), which is 1/2; that is 34 × 1 × 1/32 = ½ .

A geometric mean is often used when comparing different items – finding a single "figure of merit" for these items – when each item has multiple properties that have different numeric ranges.[1] For example, the geometric mean can give a meaningful "average" to compare two companies which are each rated at 0 to 5 for their environmental sustainability, and are rated at 0 to 100 for their financial viability. If an arithmetic mean was used instead of a geometric mean, the financial viability is given more weight because its numeric range is larger- so a small percentage change in the financial rating (e.g. going from 80 to 90) makes a much larger difference in the arithmetic mean than a large percentage change in environmental sustainability (e.g. going from 2 to 5). The use of a geometric mean "normalizes" the ranges being averaged, so that no range dominates the weighting, and a given percentage change in any of the properties has the same effect on the geometric mean. So, a 20% change in environmental sustainability from 4 to 4.8 has the same effect on the geometric mean as a 20% change in financial viability from 60 to 72.

The geometric mean can be understood in terms of geometry. The geometric mean of two numbers, a and b, is the length of one side of a square whose area is equal to the area of a rectangle with sides of lengths a and b. Similarly, the geometric mean of three numbers, a, b, and c, is the length of one side of a cube whose volume is the same as that of a cuboid with sides whose lengths are equal to the three given numbers.

The geometric mean applies only to positive numbers.[2] It is also often used for a set of numbers whose values are meant to be multiplied together or are exponential in nature, such as data on the growth of the human population or interest rates of a financial investment.

The geometric mean is also one of the three classical Pythagorean means, together with the aforementioned arithmetic mean and the harmonic mean. For all positive data sets containing at least one pair of unequal values, the harmonic mean is always the least of the three means, while the arithmetic mean is always the greatest of the three and the geometric mean is always in between (see Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means.)

## Calculation

The geometric mean of a data set $\{a_1,a_2 , \ldots,a_n\}$ is given by:

$\bigg(\prod_{i=1}^n a_i \bigg)^{1/n} = \sqrt[n]{a_1 a_2 \cdots a_n}.$

The geometric mean of a data set is less than the data set's arithmetic mean unless all members of the data set are equal, in which case the geometric and arithmetic means are equal. This allows the definition of the arithmetic-geometric mean, a mixture of the two which always lies in between.

The geometric mean is also the arithmetic-harmonic mean in the sense that if two sequences (an) and (hn) are defined:

$a_{n+1} = \frac{a_n + h_n}{2}, \quad a_0=x$

and

$h_{n+1} = \frac{2}{\frac{1}{a_n} + \frac{1}{h_n}}, \quad h_0=y$

where hn+1 is the harmonic mean of the previous values of the two sequences, then an and hn will converge to the geometric mean of x and y.

This can be seen easily from the fact that the sequences do converge to a common limit (which can be shown by Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem) and the fact that geometric mean is preserved:

$\sqrt{a_ih_i}=\sqrt{\frac{a_i+h_i}{\frac{a_i+h_i}{h_ia_i}}}=\sqrt{\frac{a_i+h_i}{\frac{1}{a_i}+\frac{1}{h_i}}}=\sqrt{a_{i+1}h_{i+1}}$

Replacing the arithmetic and harmonic mean by a pair of generalized means of opposite, finite exponents yields the same result.

### Relationship with arithmetic mean of logarithms

By using logarithmic identities to transform the formula, the multiplications can be expressed as a sum and the power as a multiplication.

$\bigg(\prod_{i=1}^na_i \bigg)^{1/n} = \exp\left[\frac1n\sum_{i=1}^n\ln a_i\right]$

This is sometimes called the log-average. It is simply computing the arithmetic mean of the logarithm-transformed values of $a_i$ (i.e., the arithmetic mean on the log scale) and then using the exponentiation to return the computation to the original scale, i.e., it is the generalised f-mean with f(x) = log x. For example, the geometric mean of 2 and 8 can be calculated as:

$b^{(\log_b (2)+\log_b (8))/2} = 4,$

where b is any base of a logarithm (commonly 2, e or 10).

### Relationship with arithmetic mean and mean-preserving spread

If a set of non-identical numbers is subjected to a mean-preserving spread — that is, two or more elements of the set are "spread apart" from each other while leaving the arithmetic mean unchanged — then the geometric mean always decreases.[3]

### Computation in constant time

In cases where the geometric mean is being used to determine the average growth rate of some quantity, and the initial and final values $a_0$ and $a_n$ of that quantity are known, the product of the measured growth rate at every step need not be taken. Instead, the geometric mean is simply

$\left(\frac{a_n}{a_0}\right)^{\frac1n},$

where $n$ is the number of steps from the initial to final state.

If the values are $a_0, \ldots, a_n$, then the growth rate between measurement $a_k$ and $a_{k+1}$ is $a_{k+1}/a_k$. The geometric mean of these growth rates is just

$\left( \frac{a_1}{a_0} \frac{a_2}{a_1} \cdots \frac{a_n}{a_{n-1}} \right)^{\frac1n} = \left(\frac{a_n}{a_0}\right)^{\frac1n}$

## Properties

The fundamental property of the geometric mean, which can be proven to be false for any other mean, is

$GM\left(\frac{X_i}{Y_i}\right) = \frac{GM(X_i)}{GM(Y_i)}$

This makes the geometric mean the only correct mean when averaging normalized results, that is results that are presented as ratios to reference values.[4] This is the case when presenting computer performance with respect to a reference computer, or when computing a single average index from several heterogeneous sources (for example life expectancy, education years and infant mortality). In this scenario, using the arithmetic or harmonic mean would change the ranking of the results depending on what is used as a reference. For example, take the following comparison of execution time of computer programs:

Computer A Computer B Computer C
Program 1 1 10 20
Program 2 1000 100 20
Arithmetic mean 500.5 55 20
Geometric mean 31.622 . . . 31.622 . . . 20

The arithmetic and geometric means "agree" that computer C is the fastest. However, by presenting appropriately normalized values and using the arithmetic mean, we can show either of the other two computers to be the fastest. Normalizing by A's result gives A as the fastest computer according to the arithmetic mean:

Computer A Computer B Computer C
Program 1 1 10 20
Program 2 1 0.1 0.02
Arithmetic mean 1 5.05 10.01
Geometric mean 1 1 0.632 . . .

while normalizing by B's result gives B as the fastest computer according to the arithmetic mean:

Computer A Computer B Computer C
Program 1 0.1 1 2
Program 2 10 1 0.2
Arithmetic mean 5.05 1 1.1
Geometric mean 1 1 0.632

In all cases, the ranking given by the geometric mean stays the same as the one obtained with unnormalized values.

## Applications

### Proportional growth

The geometric mean is more appropriate than the arithmetic mean for describing proportional growth, both exponential growth (constant proportional growth) and varying growth; in business the geometric mean of growth rates is known as the compound annual growth rate (CAGR). The geometric mean of growth over periods yields the equivalent constant growth rate that would yield the same final amount.

Suppose an orange tree yields 100 oranges one year and then 180, 210 and 300 the following years, so the growth is 80%, 16.6666% and 42.8571% for each year respectively. Using the arithmetic mean calculates a (linear) average growth of 46.5079% (80% + 16.6666% + 42.8571% divided by 3). However, if we start with 100 oranges and let it grow 46.5079% each year, the result is 314 oranges, not 300, so the linear average over-states the year-on-year growth.

Instead, we can use the geometric mean. Growing with 80% corresponds to multiplying with 1.80, so we take the geometric mean of 1.80, 1.166666 and 1.428571, i.e. $\sqrt[3]{1.80 \times 1.166666 \times 1.428571} = 1.442249$; thus the "average" growth per year is 44.2249%. If we start with 100 oranges and let the number grow with 44.2249% each year, the result is 300 oranges.

### Applications in the social sciences

Although the geometric mean has been relatively rare in computing social statistics, starting from 2010 the United Nations Human Development Index did switch to this mode of calculation, on the grounds that it better reflected the non-substitutable nature of the statistics being compiled and compared:

The geometric mean decreases the level of substitutability between dimensions [being compared] and at the same time ensures that a 1 percent decline in say life expectancy at birth has the same impact on the HDI as a 1 percent decline in education or income. Thus, as a basis for comparisons of achievements, this method is also more respectful of the intrinsic differences across the dimensions than a simple average.[5]

Note that not all values used to compute the HDI are normalized; some of them instead have the form $(X - X_\min) / (X_\mathrm{norm} - X_\min)$. This makes the choice of the geometric mean less obvious than one would expect from the "Properties" section above.

### Aspect ratios

Equal area comparison of the aspect ratios used by Kerns Powers to derive the SMPTE 16:9 standard.[6] TV 4:3/1.33 in red, 1.66 in orange, 16:9/1.77 in blue, 1.85 in yellow, Panavision/2.2 in mauve and CinemaScope/2.35 in purple.

The geometric mean has been used in choosing a compromise aspect ratio in film and video: given two aspect ratios, the geometric mean of them provides a compromise between them, distorting or cropping both in some sense equally. Concretely, two equal area rectangles (with the same center and parallel sides) of different aspect ratios intersect in a rectangle whose aspect ratio is the geometric mean, and their hull (smallest rectangle which contains both of them) likewise has aspect ratio their geometric mean.

In the choice of 16:9 aspect ratio by the SMPTE, balancing 2.35 and 4:3, the geometric mean is $\sqrt{2.35 \times \frac{4}{3}} \approx 1.7701$, and thus 16:9 = 1.777... was chosen. This was discovered empirically by Kerns Powers, who cut out rectangles with equal areas and shaped them to match each of the popular aspect ratios. When overlapped with their center points aligned, he found that all of those aspect ratio rectangles fit within an outer rectangle with an aspect ratio of 1.77:1 and all of them also covered a smaller common inner rectangle with the same aspect ratio 1.77:1.[6] The value found by Powers is exactly the geometric mean of the extreme aspect ratios, 4:3 (1.33:1) and CinemaScope (2.35:1), which is coincidentally close to 16:9 (1.777:1). Note that the intermediate ratios have no effect on the result, only the two extreme ratios.

Applying the same geometric mean technique to 16:9 and 4:3 approximately yields the 14:9 (1.555...) aspect ratio, which is likewise used as a compromise between these ratios.[7] In this case 14:9 is exactly the arithmetic mean of 16:9 and 4:3 = 12:9, since 14 is the average of 16 and 12, while the precise geometric mean is $\sqrt{\frac{16}{9}\times\frac{4}{3}} \approx 1.5396 \approx 13.8:9,$ but the two different means, arithmetic and geometric, are approximately equal because both numbers are sufficiently close to each other (a difference of less than 2%).

### Anti-reflective coatings

In optical coatings, where reflection needs to be minimised between two media of refractive indices n0 and n2, the optimum refractive index n1 of the anti-reflective coating is given by the geometric mean: $n_1 = \sqrt{n_0 n_2}$.

### Spectral flatness

In signal processing, spectral flatness, a measure of how flat or spiky a spectrum is, is defined as the ratio of the geometric mean of the power spectrum to its arithmetic mean.

### Geometry

The length of the altitude of a right triangle from the hypotenuse to the right angle, where the altitude is perpendicular to the hypotenuse, is the geometric mean of the two segments into which the hypotenuse is divided.

In an ellipse, the semi-minor axis is the geometric mean of the maximum and minimum distances of the ellipse from a focus; and the semi-major axis of the ellipse is the geometric mean of the distance from the center to either focus and the distance from the center to either directrix.

## Notes and references

1. ^ "TPC-D – Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)". Transaction Processing Performance Council. Retrieved 9 January 2012.
2. ^ The geometric mean only applies to positive numbers in order to avoid taking the root of a negative product, which would result in imaginary numbers, and also to satisfy certain properties about means, which is explained later in the article. Note that the definition is unambiguous if one allows 0 (which yields a geometric mean of 0), but may be excluded, as one frequently wishes to take the logarithm of geometric means (to convert between multiplication and addition), and one cannot take the logarithm of 0.
3. ^ Mitchell, Douglas W., "More on spreads and non-arithmetic means," The Mathematical Gazette 88, March 2004, 142–144.
4. ^ Philip J. Fleming and John J. Wallace. How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summarize benchmark results. Communications of the ACM, 29(3):218–221, March 1986.
5. ^ http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/faq/
6. ^ a b TECHNICAL BULLETIN: Understanding Aspect Ratios. The CinemaSource Press. 2001. Retrieved 2009-10-24.
7. ^ US 5956091, "Method of showing 16:9 pictures on 4:3 displays", issued September 21, 1999
 111446 videos foundNext >
 The Geometric MeanThe Geometric Mean. In this video, I show how to find the geometric mean of two numbers and show what that number means in relation to the numbers that you s... Geometry - Right Triangle Similarity, Geometric MeanThis video shows what the geometric mean is and how it is applied to similar right triangles. Right triangle similarity examples are demonstrated with and wi... GEOMETRIC MEAN (ANIMATION)Demonstrates how a right triangle may be divided into two other proportional right triangles by the use of the geometric mean. Geometric Mean ExplainedThis video explains how to calculate the geometric mean of two numbers, in addition to when it is used to find the altitude of a right triangle. Geometric Mean Example problem similar triangleIn this is yet another example of geometric mean with similar triangles where a right triangle with an altitude is split into three similar triangles. Thanks... Geometric vs. Arithmetic Average ReturnsThis video introduces the concept of Geometric Average Returns. An example is used to illustrate how to calculate arithmetic and geometric returns and to ill... Geometric Means in a Geometric SequenceI explain how to find missing Geometric Means within a Geometric Sequence. I finish with two examples...first one relatively easy...the second is not so much:) How to Solve Right Triangle Altitude Problems: Geometric Mean #1http://www.mathpowerline.com Schedule a free live math session with Terry VanNoy, founder of the MathPowerLine web site & blog. Sample lessons, resources for... Excel Statistics 35: Weighted Mean & Geometric MeanSee how to calculate Weighted Mean, Geometric Mean, and see how to use the GEOMEAN function. Geometric Averages are more accurate than Mean Averages for Rate... How to Find the Geometric Meanhttp://www.mathpowerline.com Schedule a free live math session with Terry VanNoy, founder of the MathPowerLine web site & blog. Sample lessons, resources for...
 111446 videos foundNext >
 90 news items
 Five State Park Beaches Temporarily Closed For Water Quality Issues KTTS Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:26:22 -0700 Beaches will be closed for high bacteria when a single E. coli sample exceeds 235 cfu/100ml or when the geometric mean – a 30-day rolling average – exceeds 126 cfu/100 ml. The sample test results indicate a snap shot of the water quality taken at the ... No body contact warning for Westside Park HollandSentinel.com Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:24:43 -0700 The standard for total body contact is 130 E. coli per 100 milliliters based upon a geometric mean of all individual samples taken during five or more sampling events over a 30-day period. Additionally, no single sampling event (daily event) should ... Inovio's H7N9 DNA vaccine generates first protective antibody responses ... pharmabiz.com Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:33:34 -0700 ... Winnipeg demonstrated that Inovio's H7N9 influenza DNA vaccine achieved greater than 1:40 hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) in 100 per cent of tested animals (n=10), with a geometric mean HAI titer of 1:130 against the A/Anhui/1/13 strain of H7N9 ... Guam EPA Weekly Beach Report: 8 Advisories, Same Beach Closed Pacific News Center Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:35:53 -0700 The samples are analyzed for concentrations of the enterococcus bacteria indicator. Advisories are based on an instantaneous standard of not greater than 104 enterococci/100 ml and a geometric mean standard of not greater than 35 enterococci/100 ml. Beeds Lake swimming advisory issued Mason City Globe Gazette Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:22:25 -0700 The sample collected this week registered 141.37 which exceeded the geometric mean standard of 126 E. coli per 100 milliliters of water. A swimming advisory is not closing the beach but anyone swimming should take additional precautions, including ... Many sources pollute Maxwelton watershed South Whidbey Record Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:15:14 -0700 DuBose said this is because of the size of the area, which constitutes the largest watershed in Island County and has a commensurate share of animal waste and failing septic systems. The state standards require that the geometric mean, which is the ... Preliminary June 2013 Michigan Consumer Sentiment Down Fractionally Global Economic Intersection Fri, 14 Jun 2013 07:33:12 -0700 To put today's report into the larger historical context since its beginning in 1978, consumer sentiment is now 3% below the average reading (arithmetic mean) and 2% below the geometric mean. The current index level is at the 39th percentile of the 426 ... Truman State Park beach temporarily closed for e. coli Lake Expo Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:52:41 -0700 Beaches will be closed for high bacteria when a single E. coli sample exceeds 235 cfu/100ml or when the geometric mean – a 30-day rolling average – exceeds 126 cfu/100 ml. The sample test results indicate a snap shot of the water quality taken at the ...
 Limit to books that you can completely read online Include partial books (book previews) .gsc-branding { display:block; }

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

# Talk About Geometric mean

You can talk about Geometric mean with people all over the world in our discussions.

#### Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!