digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

"Disagree" redirects here. For the Malaysian band, see Disagree (band).
For other uses, see Controversy (disambiguation).
Auseinandersetzung ("controversy"), by Karl-Henning Seemann.

Controversy is a state of prolonged public dispute or debate, usually concerning a matter of conflicting opinion or point of view. The word was coined from the Latin controversia, as a composite of controversus – "turned in an opposite direction," from contra – "against" – and vertere – to turn, or versus (see verse), hence, "to turn against."

The most applicable or well known controversial subjects, topics or areas are politics, religion and sex.[1][2][3] Other areas of controversy include history and philosophy. Other minor yet prominent areas of controversy are economics, science, finances, culture, education, the military, society, celebrities, organisation, the media, age, gender, and race. Controversy in matters of theology has traditionally been particularly heated, giving rise to the phrase odium theologicum. Controversial issues are held as potentially divisive in a given society, because they can lead to tension and ill will, as a result they are often taboo to be discussed in the light of company in many cultures.

Legal controversy[edit]

Main article: Controversy (law)

In the theory of law, a controversy differs from a legal case; while legal cases include all suits, criminal as well as civil, a controversy is a purely civil proceeding.

For example, the Case or Controversy Clause of Article Three of the United States Constitution (Section 2, Clause 1) states that "the judicial Power shall extend ... to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party". This clause has been deemed to impose a requirement that United States federal courts are not permitted to hear cases that do not pose an actual controversy—that is, an actual dispute between adverse parties which is capable of being resolved by the [court]. In addition to setting out the scope of the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, it also prohibits courts from issuing advisory opinions, or from hearing cases that are either unripe, meaning that the controversy has not arisen yet, or moot, meaning that the controversy has already been resolved.

Benford's law of controversy[edit]

Benford's law of controversy, as expressed by science fiction author Gregory Benford in 1980, states: Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real (true) information available.[4][5] In other words, the fewer facts are known to and agreed on by the participants, the more controversy there is, and the more is known the less controversy there is. Thus, for example, controversies in physics are limited to subject-areas where experiments cannot be carried out yet, whereas Benford's Law implies that controversy is inherent to politics, where communities must frequently decide on courses of action based on insufficient information.

Psychological bases of controversy[edit]

Controversies are frequently thought to be a result of a lack of confidence on the part of the disputants - as in Benford's law of controversy. For example, in the political controversy over anthropogenic climate change that is prevalent in the United States - it has been thought that those who are opposed to the scientific consensus did so because of a lack of evidence.[6][7] A study of 1540 US adults[8] found instead that levels of scientific literacy were correlated with the strength of opinion on climate change, but not on which side of the debate that they stood.

The puzzling phenomenon of two individuals being exposed to the same evidence and being able to reach different conclusions, has been frequently explained (particularly by Daniel Kahneman) by reference to a 'bounded rationality' - that is most judgments are made by fast acting heuristics (system 1)[9][10] that work well in every day situations, but are not amenable to decision making about complex subjects such as climate change. Anchoring has been particularly identified as relevant in climate change controversies [11] as individuals are found to be more positively inclined to believe in climate change if the outside temperature is higher, if they have been primed to think about heat, and if they are primed with higher temperatures when thinking about the future temperature increases from climate change.

In other controversies - such as that around the HPV vaccine, the same evidence seemed to license inference to radically different conclusions.[12] Kahan et al.[13] explained this by the cognitive biases of biased assimilation[14] and a credibility heuristic.[15]

Similar effects on reasoning are also seen in non-scientific controversies, for example in the gun control debate in the United States.[16] As with other controversies, it has been suggested that exposure to empirical facts would be sufficient to resolve the debate once and for all.[17][18] In computer simulations of cultural communities, beliefs were found to polarize within isolated sub-groups, based on the mistaken belief of the community's unhindered access to ground truth.[16] Such confidence in the group to find the ground truth is explicable through the success of wisdom of the crowd based inferences,[19] however, if there is no access to the ground truth, as there was not in this model, the method will fail.

Bayesian decision theory allows these failures of rationality to be described as part of a statistically optimized system for decision making. Experiments and computational models in multisensory integration have shown that sensory input from different senses is integrated in a statistically optimal way,[20] in addition, it appears that the kind of inferences used to infer single sources for multiple sensory inputs uses a Bayesian inference about the causal origin of the sensory stimuli.[21] As such, it appears neurobiologically plausible that the brain implements decision-making procedures that are close to optimal for Bayesian inference.

Brocas and Carrillo propose a model to make decisions based on noisy sensory inputs,[22] beliefs about the state of the world are modified by Bayesian updating, and then decisions are made based on beliefs passing a threshold. They show that this model, when optimized for single-step decision making, produces belief anchoring and polarization of opinions - exactly as described in the global warming controversy context - in spite of identical evidence presented, the pre-existing beliefs (or evidence presented first) has an overwhelming effect on the beliefs formed. In addition, the preferences of the agent (the particular rewards that they value) also cause the beliefs formed to change - this explains the biased assimilation (also known as confirmation bias) shown above. This model allows the production of controversy to be seen as a consequence of a decision maker optimized for single-step decision making, rather than as a result of limited reasoning in the bounded rationality of Daniel Kahneman.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ U.S. News & World Report, Volume 117, Issues 10-17, 1994 quotation:

    Perhaps that was inevitable, since abortion touches on three of the most contentious subjects in human discourse: religion, sex and politics.

  2. ^ Kenneth L. Karst (1995) Law's Promise, Law's Expression p.137 quotation:

    Religion, sex and politics: in my younger days, these were the subjects you weren't supposed to discuss at the dinner table.

  3. ^ Susan Spencer, Margo Collins, Albert J. Rivero (2004) The eighteenth-century novel: Volume 4 p.6

    ...the expiration of the Printing Act in 1695 swelled the number of licensed printers, while the relaxation of censorship under the Restoration opened once-guarded topics, especially religion, sex, and politics, for public discussion

  4. ^ "EFF Quotes Collection 19.6". Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2001-04-09. 
  5. ^ "Quotations: Computer Laws". SysProg. Archived from the original on 2008-08-22. Retrieved 2007-03-10. 
  6. ^ Ungar, S. (2000). "Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole". Public Understanding of Science 9 (3): 297–312. 
  7. ^ Pidgeon, N.; B. Fischhoff (2011). "The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks". Nature Climate Change 1 (1): 35–41. Bibcode:2011NatCC...1...35P. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080. 
  8. ^ Kahan, Dan M.; Maggie Wittlin; Ellen Peters; Paul Slovic; Lisa Larrimore Ouellette; Donald Braman; Gregory N. Mandel (2011). "The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change". SSRN eLibrary. SSRN 1871503. 
  9. ^ Kahneman, Daniel (2003-12-01). "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics". The American Economic Review 93 (5): 1449–1475. doi:10.1257/000282803322655392. ISSN 0002-8282. JSTOR 3132137. 
  10. ^ Tversky, A.; D. Kahneman (1974). "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases". Science 185 (4157): 1124–31. Bibcode:1974Sci...185.1124T. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457. 
  11. ^ Joireman, Jeff; Heather Barnes Truelove; Blythe Duell (December 2010). "Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming". Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 (4): 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.004. ISSN 0272-4944. Retrieved 2011-11-26. 
  12. ^ Saul, Stephanie; Andrew Pollack (2007-02-17). "Furor on Rush to Require Cervical Cancer Vaccine". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2011-11-26. 
  13. ^ Kahan, Dan M.; Donald Braman; Geoffrey L. Cohen; Paul Slovic; John Gastil (2008-07-15). "Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition". SSRN eLibrary. SSRN 1160654. 
  14. ^ Lord, Charles G.; Lee Ross; Mark R. Lepper (1979). "Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098. ISSN 0022-3514. Retrieved 2011-11-26. 
  15. ^ HOVLAND, CARL I.; WALTER WEISS (1951-12-21). "The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness". Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4): 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350. Retrieved 2011-11-27. 
  16. ^ a b Braman, Donald; James Grimmelmann; Dan M. Kahan. "Modeling Cultural Cognition". SSRN eLibrary. SSRN 1000449. 
  17. ^ Fremling, G.M.; J.R. Lott Jr (2002). "Surprising Finding That Cultural Worldviews Don't Explain People's Views on Gun Control, The". U. Pa. L. Rev. 151: 1341. 
  18. ^ Ayres, I.; J.J. Donohue III (2002). "Shooting down the more guns, less crime hypothesis". National Bureau of Economic Research. 
  19. ^ Lee, M.D.; M. Steyvers, M. de Young, B.J. Miller. A Model-Based Approach to Measuring Expertise in Ranking Tasks. 
  20. ^ Ernst, Marc O.; Martin S. Banks (2002-01-24). "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion". Nature 415 (6870): 429–433. Bibcode:2002Natur.415..429E. doi:10.1038/415429a. ISSN 0028-0836. 
  21. ^ Wozny, D.R.; U.R. Beierholm, L. Shams (2008). "Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference". Journal of vision 8 (3). 
  22. ^ Brocas, Isabelle; Juan D. Carrillo. "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes". Games and Economic Behavior (0). doi:10.1016/j.geb.2011.10.001. ISSN 0899-8256. Retrieved 2011-11-27. 

External links[edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversy — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
1000000 videos foundNext > 

Natalia Kills Controversy HQ full

Natalia Kills Controversy HQ full.

Miley Cyrus Bangerz Tour Controversy! (EXPLICIT VIDEO)

Miley Cyrus Bangerz Tour Controversy! (EXPLICIT VIDEO) Subscribe to Hollywire | http://bit.ly/Sub2HotMinute Send Chelsea a Tweet! | http://bit.ly/TweetChelse...

Del Potro and Raonic Controversy in Montreal 2013

Umpire Lahyani made a controversial call that benefits Milos Raonic after he clearly body-touched the net while putting away a winner during the 3rd round en...

Top 5 - Gaming controversies of 2013

Whew! Another year, another boat-load of video game controversy to grit your teeth over. And man was there a lot of it in 2013. From DLC stupidity and copyri...

CONTROVERSY ERUPTS AFTER FLOYD MAYWEATHER TRIES ON MAIDANA'S GLOVES: "AIN'T NO PADDING IN THE GLOVE"

"One thing we not going to do, we not going to pull no snake bullshit...put him in the same shit as me...we gonna be on an even playing field," stated undefe...

ORIGINAL CONCEPT & CHOREOGRAPHY YANIS MARSHALL. MUSIC "CONTROVERSY" BY NATALIA KILLS.

PLEASE WATCH IT IN 720p / 1080p FOR HD QUALITY! ORIGINAL CONCET & CHOREOGRAPHY : YANIS MARSHALL. DIRECTED & EDITED : FERNANDO DE AZEVEDO. I'm so proud of thi...

Teens React to Jonah Hill Controversy

Jonah Hill EXTENDED Version: http://goo.gl/Pi2DUH Link to subscribe to our channel: http://bit.ly/TheFineBros Link to all episodes of React http://goo.gl/4iDVa ---------------------- Watch...

Controversy of Intelligence: Crash Course Psychology #23

You can directly support Crash Course at http://www.subbable.com/crashcourse Subscribe for as little as $0 to keep up with everything we're doing. Also, if y...

mankand wicket Huge controversy in the England vs Sri Lanka match!

Huge controversy in the England vs Sri Lanka match! Jos Buttler is "Mankaded" by Senanayake. Buttler is given out and the Sri Lankans are booed by the crowd.

Andy Fox reports on York County business controversy

Andy Fox reports on York County business controversy.

1000000 videos foundNext > 

5001215 news items

WJLA

WJLA
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 18:52:30 -0700

DETROIT, Mich. (WJLA/AP) -- Detroit's massive municipal water department, which has been widely criticized for widespread service shutoffs to thousands of customers, drew nationwide attention Thursday on Capitol Hill. Continue reading. People stand ...

ABC News

Washington Post
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:41:15 -0700

“They miscalculated that,” said an executive with one team who, like the others, spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing the intensity of the controversy surrounding the decision and the fact that Rice plays for another franchise. “They could not ...
 
Pittsburgh Post Gazette
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:07:30 -0700

The first day of hearings in Pittsburgh on proposed federal carbon controls for coal-burning power plants spawned a march by thousands of coal miners and a rally by hundreds of environmentalists and succeeded in demonstrating that a major change in the ...

Oneindia

Oneindia
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 04:11:54 -0700

The controversy began after the website published an article which portrayed Indian prime minister Narendra Modi and Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa in a derogatory manner. "An article titled 'How meaningful are Jayalalitha's love letters to ...
 
Montgomery Advertiser
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 19:37:30 -0700

The daily saga affecting Alabama State University reflects one distinct fact: Many people within the university leadership are spending a great deal of time and effort taking each other's inventory rather than directing their efforts to the student ...

New Zimbabwe.com

New Zimbabwe.com
Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:18:45 -0700

The actor was a nuisance as he waited his turn to audition for Big Brother Africa's next season which commences in September in South Africa, by wanting to ride on his age old controversy in the past. “He kept strutting along the passageway and being ...

Salon

Salon
Thu, 31 Jul 2014 12:44:54 -0700

Longtime promotional and marketing partners Southwest Airlines and SeaWorld have announced their decision to part ways after their contract expires at the end of 2014. Their relationship began in 1988 and involved combined deals on the airline and ...
 
Baxter Bulletin
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:33:45 -0700

FAYETTEVILLE – If Bret Bielema had the controversy at the Razorbacks' 21 other positions that he does at running back, Arkansas would be picked to win the SEC West instead of finish last. Off a 3-9 season that closed with nine consecutive losses ...
Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Controversy

You can talk about Controversy with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!