digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















Chapelton v Barry UDC
Deckchair 600.jpg
Court Court of Appeal
Citation(s) [1940] 1 KB 532
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Slesser LJ, Mackinnon LJ and Goddard LJ

Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532 is an English contract law case on offer and acceptance and exclusion clauses. It stands for the proposition that a display of goods can be an offer, rather than an invitation to treat, and serves as an example for how onerous exclusion clauses can be deemed to not be incorporated in a contract.


David Chapelton went to a beach with his friend, Miss Andrews, at Cold Knap. There was a pile of deckchairs. A notice next to them said,

"Barry Urban District Council. Cold Knap. Hire of chairs 2d. per session of 3 hours."

It also said tickets should be obtained from attendants. Mr Chapelton got two chairs from an attendant, paid the money and got two tickets. He put them in his pocket. On the ticket was written,

"Available for three hours. Time expires where indicated by cut-off and should be retained and shown on request. The council will not be liable for any accident or damage arising from the hire of the chair."

When Mr Chapelton sat on the chair it gave way, the canvas tearing from the top of the chair. He was injured. The County Court judge held the council was negligent but that liability was exempted by the ticket. Mr Chapelton appealed.


The Court of Appeal upheld Mr Chapelton's claim. He held that there was a valid offer when the chairs were on display, accepted when picked up the chairs from the defendant. Therefore, the ticket was merely a receipt of the contract, and the exclusion clause could not be incorporated as a term, because it was too late. Slesser LJ read the facts and gave his judgment first.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ 2 CPD 416, 422
  2. ^ [1930] 1 KB 41 , 53
  3. ^ a b [1930] 1 K. B. 41

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapelton_v_Barry_UDC — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
73 videos foundNext > 

Chapelton v Barry UDC

Caveat: This video does not give you the decision in the case of Chapelton v Barry UDC, a case in Contract Law on Exclusion Clauses. It is a simulation that is ...

UDC VS COM (Video Temporaire)


Chapelton will be a vibrant new community ten miles south of Aberdeen, adapting the best traditions of Scottish town design for modern living. From an ...

Chapelton Cottage

Chapelton steam rally 2013 (the bits you didn't see) part 3

Tant Legend Chapelton

Coronation Anthem and Fugue (Krell v. Henry)

All of the events described in this song took place more or less exactly as the song describes them. For example, the coronation of Edward VII had indeed been ...

Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store

This brief cartoon lays out the story of Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store. Any similarity to real persons or events is completely intentional. You are ...

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking

A simulation of the case of Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking - a case in Contract Law involving Exclusion Clauses.

Spencer v Harding 1870 LR 5 CP 561

go to www.studentlawnotes.com to listen to the full audio summary.

73 videos foundNext > 

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Chapelton v Barry UDC" right now.


Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight