digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:


Applied sciences






















In geotechnical engineering, bearing capacity is the capacity of soil to support the loads applied to the ground. The bearing capacity of soil is the maximum average contact pressure between the foundation and the soil which should not produce shear failure in the soil. Ultimate bearing capacity is the theoretical maximum pressure which can be supported without failure; allowable bearing capacity is the ultimate bearing capacity divided by a factor of safety. Sometimes, on soft soil sites, large settlements may occur under loaded foundations without actual shear failure occurring; in such cases, the allowable bearing capacity is based on the maximum allowable settlement.

There are three modes of failure that limit bearing capacity: general shear failure, local shear failure, and punching shear failure.


A foundation is the part of a structure which transmits the weight of the structure to the ground. All structures constructed on land are supported on foundations. A foundation is, therefore, a connecting link between the structure proper and the ground which supports it.

General shear failure[edit]

The general shear failure case is the one normally analyzed. Prevention against other failure modes is accounted for implicitly in settlement calculations.[1] There are many different methods for computing when this failure will occur.

Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory[edit]

Karl von Terzaghi was the first to present a comprehensive theory for the evaluation of the ultimate bearing capacity of rough shallow foundations. This theory states that a foundation is shallow if its depth is less than or equal to its width.[2] Later investigations, however, have suggested that foundations with a depth, measured from the ground surface, equal to 3 to 4 times their width may be defined as shallow foundations.[2]

Terzaghi developed a method for determining bearing capacity for the general shear failure case in 1943. The equations, which take into account soil cohesion, soil friction, embedment surcharge, and self-weight, are given below. [2]

For square foundations:

 q_{ult} = 1.3 c' N_c + \sigma '_{zD} N_q + 0.4 \gamma ' B N_\gamma \

For continuous foundations:

 q_{ult} = c' N_c + \sigma '_{zD} N_q + 0.5 \gamma ' B N_\gamma \

For circular foundations:

 q_{ult} = 1.3 c' N_c + \sigma '_{zD} N_q + 0.3 \gamma ' B N_\gamma \


 N_q = \frac{ e ^{ 2 \pi \left( 0.75 - \phi '/360 \right) \tan \phi ' } }{2 \cos ^2 \left( 45 + \phi '/2 \right) }
 N_c = 5.7 \ for φ' = 0
 N_c = \frac{ N_q - 1 }{ \tan \phi '} for φ' > 0
 N_\gamma = \frac{ \tan \phi ' }{2} \left( \frac{ K_{p \gamma} }{ \cos ^2 \phi ' } - 1 \right)
c′ is the effective cohesion.
σzD′ is the vertical effective stress at the depth the foundation is laid.
γ′ is the effective unit weight when saturated or the total unit weight when not fully saturated.
B is the width or the diameter of the foundation.
φ′ is the effective internal angle of friction.
K is obtained graphically. Simplifications have been made to eliminate the need for K. One such was done by Coduto, given below, and it is accurate to within 10%.[1]
 N_\gamma = \frac{ 2 \left( N_q + 1 \right) \tan \phi ' }{1 + 0.4 \sin 4 \phi ' }

For foundations that exhibit the local shear failure mode in soils, Terzaghi suggested the following modifications to the previous equations. The equations are given below.

For square foundations:

 q_{ult} = 0.867 c' N '_c + \sigma '_{zD} N '_q + 0.4 \gamma ' B N '_\gamma \

For continuous foundations:

 q_{ult} = \frac{2}{3} c' N '_c + \sigma '_{zD} N '_q + 0.5 \gamma ' B N '_\gamma \

For circular foundations:

 q_{ult} = 0.867 c' N '_c + \sigma '_{zD} N '_q + 0.3 \gamma ' B N '_\gamma \

 N '_c,  N '_q and  N '_y , the modified bearing capacity factors, can be calculated by using the bearing capacity factors equations(for  N_c, N_q, and N_y, respectively) by replacing the effective internal angle of friction(\phi ') by a value equal to  : tan^{-1}\, (\frac{2}{3} tan \phi ') [2]

Meyerhof's Bearing Capacity theory[edit]

In 1951, Meyerhof published a bearing capacity theory which could be applied to rough shallow and deep foundations..[3] Meyerhof (1951, 1963) proposed a bearing-capacity equation similar to that of Terzaghi's but included a shape factor s-q with the depth term Nq. He also included depth factors and inclination factors.

Factor of Safety[edit]

Calculating the gross allowable-load bearing capacity of shallow foundations requires the application of a factor of safety(FS) to the gross ultimate bearing capacity, or:

 q_{all} = \frac{q_{ult}}{FS} [2]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Coduto, Donald (2001), Foundation Design, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 0-13-589706-8 
  2. ^ a b c d e Das, Braja (2007), Principles of Foundation Engineering (6th ed.), Stamford, CT: Cengage Publisher 
  3. ^ Das, Braja (1999), Bearing Capacity and Settlement, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC 

External links[edit]

Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bearing_capacity — Please support Wikipedia.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia. A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.

2525 news items


Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:41:15 -0800

Reinforced concrete pipes are used extensively in storm water and sewage applications. In North America, these pipes are often designed using the “Indirect Design Method”, which relates the strength of a pipe tested above ground to one buried in the ...

Greater Kashmir

Greater Kashmir
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:52:30 -0800

Do not make drastic moves one way or the other when you find your investment within the ambit of your risk bearing capacity. Meanwhile, is the current carnage in stock market an indication of a 'perfect storm' on cards on the lines of 2008 or even ...

BW Businessworld

BW Businessworld
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:37:30 -0800

Says Sinha: “If you are on the other end of the spectrum, where the risk-bearing capacity is high, it makes sense for you to utilise calendar year 2016 to top up your equity assets to the extent your risk appetite permits. There is no perfect bottom ...

Chillicothe Gazette

Chillicothe Gazette
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:37:30 -0800

The airport in 2014 was upgraded to a category one facility when the weight-bearing capacity of its asphalt runway was determined to go from a 50,000-pound footprint to a 100,000-pound footprint. That change, which meant that aircraft up to 100,000 ...

Scottish Construction Now

Scottish Construction Now
Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:37:30 -0800

Deep-water facilities at Dales Voe are being expanded in support of offshore industry subsea developments and decommissioning, with the 12.5-metres deep quay being extended 75-metres to 130-metres. It will have a load-bearing capacity of 60 tonnes per ...

Heavy Lift

Heavy Lift
Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:18:45 -0800

In preparation a full-scale mock-up of the jobsite mimicking actual lifting conditions was prepared off site; the telescopic gantry system and turntable was tested to 125 percent of its maximum load bearing capacity. "We learned from the mock-up that ...


Fish Update
Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:18:45 -0800

It will have a load-bearing capacity of 60 tonnes per square metre, unmatched in Scotland, and will be completed later this year. Laurenson said: 'By expanding our capacity and ensuring our competitiveness, we are underpinning Lerwick's advantages ...

Shetland Times Online

Shetland Times Online
Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:26:15 -0800

Deep-water facilities at Dales Voe are being expanded in support of offshore industry subsea developments and decommissioning, with the 12.5-metres deep quay being extended 75-metres to 130-metres. It will have a load-bearing capacity of 60 tonnes per ...

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!

Searchlight Group

Digplanet also receives support from Searchlight Group. Visit Searchlight