digplanet beta 1: Athena
Share digplanet:

Agriculture

Applied sciences

Arts

Belief

Business

Chronology

Culture

Education

Environment

Geography

Health

History

Humanities

Language

Law

Life

Mathematics

Nature

People

Politics

Science

Society

Technology

The axiom of constructibility is a possible axiom for set theory in mathematics that asserts that every set is constructible. The axiom is usually written as V = L, where V and L denote the von Neumann universe and the constructible universe, respectively. The axiom is inconsistent with the proposition that zero sharp exists and stronger large cardinal axioms (see List of large cardinal properties).

Contents

Implications [edit]

The axiom of constructibility implies the axiom of choice over Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. It also settles many natural mathematical questions independent of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC). For example, the axiom of constructibility implies the generalized continuum hypothesis, the negation of Suslin's hypothesis, and the existence of an analytical (in fact, \Delta^1_2) non-measurable set of real numbers, all of which are independent of ZFC.

The axiom of constructibility implies the non-existence of those large cardinals with consistency strength greater or equal to 0#, which includes some "relatively small" large cardinals. Thus, no cardinal can be ω1-Erdős in L. While L does contain the initial ordinals of those large cardinals (when they exist in a supermodel of L), and they are still initial ordinals in L, it excludes the auxiliary structures (e.g. measures) which endow those cardinals with their large cardinal properties.

Although the axiom of constructibility does resolve many set-theoretic questions, it is not typically accepted as an axiom for set theory in the same way as the ZFC axioms. Among set theorists of a realist bent, who believe that the axiom of constructibility is either true or false, most believe that it is false. This is in part because it seems unnecessarily "restrictive", as it allows only certain subsets of a given set, with no clear reason to believe that these are all of them. In part it is because the axiom is contradicted by sufficiently strong large cardinal axioms. This point of view is especially associated with the Cabal, or the "California school" as Saharon Shelah would have it.

See also [edit]

References [edit]

External links [edit]


Original courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_constructibility — Please support Wikipedia.
A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia.
2 videos found

MathFoundations1: What is a number?

The first of a series that will discuss foundations of mathematics. Contains a general introduction to the series, and then the beginnings of arithmetic with...

MF38: Why angles don't really work (I)

We begin to address the many logical difficulties arising from the reliance on angles in modern mathematics. The main issue is one of precise definitions: wh...

2 videos found

We're sorry, but there's no news about "Axiom of constructibility" right now.

Loading

Oops, we seem to be having trouble contacting Twitter

Talk About Axiom of constructibility

You can talk about Axiom of constructibility with people all over the world in our discussions.

Support Wikipedia

A portion of the proceeds from advertising on Digplanet goes to supporting Wikipedia. Please add your support for Wikipedia!